# Wasserstein bounds for denoising diffusion probabilistic models via the F"ollmer process

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18069 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.18069/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 35 of its 68 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion foundations and sampling](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-foundations-and-sampling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09672/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.00796/) (2022)
- [Diffusion Models in Vision: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.04747/) (2022)
- [Tackling the Generative Learning Trilemma with Denoising Diffusion GANs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.07804/) (2021)
- [Sampling is as easy as learning the score: theory for diffusion models with minimal data assumptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.11215/) (2022)
- [Convergence of denoising diffusion models under the manifold hypothesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.05314/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Generative Diffusion Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.02646/) (2022)
- [Nearly d-Linear Convergence Bounds for Diffusion Models via Stochastic Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03686/) (2023)
- [Rapid Convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm: Isoperimetry Suffices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.08568/) (2019)
- [Improved Analysis of Score-based Generative Modeling: User-Friendly Bounds under Minimal Smoothness Assumptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01916/) (2022)
- [Convergence of score-based generative modeling for general data distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.12381/) (2022)
- [Diffusion Models are Minimax Optimal Distribution Estimators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01861/) (2023)
- [KL Convergence Guarantees for Score diffusion models under minimal data assumptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.12240/) (2023)
- [Wasserstein Convergence Guarantees for a General Class of Score-Based Generative Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11003/) (2023)
- [Adapting to Unknown Low-Dimensional Structures in Score-Based Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14861/) (2024)
- [O(d/T) Convergence Theory for Diffusion Probabilistic Models under Minimal Assumptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18959/) (2024)
- [Denoising diffusion probabilistic models are optimally adaptive to unknown low dimensionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.18784/) (2024)
- [Low-dimensional adaptation of diffusion models: Convergence in total variation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12982/) (2025)
- [Beyond Log-Concavity and Score Regularity: Improved Convergence Bounds for Score-Based Generative Models in W2-distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.02298/) (2025)
- [An analysis of the noise schedule for score-based generative models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04650/) (2024)
- [Convergence of Deterministic and Stochastic Diffusion-Model Samplers: A Simple Analysis in Wasserstein Distance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03210/) (2025)
- [Projected Langevin dynamics and a gradient flow for entropic optimal transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08598/) (2023)
- [Advancing Wasserstein Convergence Analysis of Score-Based Models: Insights from Discretization and Second-Order Acceleration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04849/) (2025)
- [Optimal Convergence Analysis of DDPM for General Distributions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.27562/) (2025)
- [Wasserstein Convergence of Score-based Generative Models under Semiconvexity and Discontinuous Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03432/) (2025)
- [Wasserstein Bounds for generative diffusion models with Gaussian tail targets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11251/) (2024)
- [Assessing the Quality of Denoising Diffusion Models in Wasserstein Distance: Noisy Score and Optimal Bounds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09681/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Diffusion Models for High-Dimensional Clustered Data: Intrinsic-Dimension Adaptivity via Bayesian Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.19067/) (2026)
- [Universal Local Error and Realized Amplification for the First-Order EDM Predictor](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.10190/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper studies sampling error bounds for denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) in the 2-Wasserstein distance. Our contributions are threefold. (i) Under general Lipschitz-type conditions on the score function and for a broad class of variance schedules, including the cosine schedule, we establish sharp upper bounds that are optimal in both the dimension and the number of steps, and recover several sharp error bounds previously obtained in the literature. (ii) We prove that the same Lipschitz-type conditions, which encompass those commonly imposed on the (learned) score, imply a logarithmic Sobolev inequality and hence a quadratic transportation cost inequality for the DDPM. As a consequence, in settings covered by existing work, an optimal Wasserstein bound, up to a logarithmic factor, follows from the recently obtained sharp error bound in the Kullback-Leibler divergence under geometric-type variance schedules. (iii) We show that for general log-concave target distributions, the optimal Wasserstein error bound remains attainable even without a quadratic transportation cost inequality for the target. Our analysis is based on viewing the DDPM sampler as a discretization of the F"ollmer process rather than the conventional reverse Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process.
