# You Can't Fool Us: Understanding the Resilience of LLM-driven Agent Communities to Misinformation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17353 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17353/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 15 of its 94 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Social simulation and multi-agent debate](https://mlsanity.com/agents/social-simulation-and-multi-agent-debate/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Society](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08691/) (2025)
- [From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.03563/) (2024)
- [SemEval-2017 Task 8: RumourEval: Determining rumour veracity and support for rumours](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1704.05972/) (2017)
- [RumourEval 2019: Determining Rumour Veracity and Support for Rumours](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.06683/) (2018)
- [The spread of low-credibility content by social bots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.07592/) (2017)
- [MOSAIC: Modeling Social AI for Content Dissemination and Regulation in Multi-Agent Simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07830/) (2025)
- [The Stepwise Deception: Simulating the Evolution from True News to Fake News with LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19064/) (2024)
- [Large Language Model-driven Multi-Agent Simulation for News Diffusion Under Different Network Structures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13909/) (2024)
- [Persuasion at Play: Understanding Misinformation Dynamics in Demographic-Aware Human-LLM Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02038/) (2025)
- [Beyond the Crowd: LLM-Augmented Community Notes for Governing Health Misinformation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.11423/) (2025)
- [Overstating Attitudes, Ignoring Networks: LLM Biases in Simulating Misinformation Susceptibility](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04674/) (2026)
- [MPCG: Multi-Round Persona-Conditioned Generation for Modeling the Evolution of Misinformation with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16564/) (2025)
- [CANDY: Benchmarking LLMs' Limitations and Assistive Potential in Chinese Misinformation Fact-Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03957/) (2025)
- [Belief-Sim: Towards Belief-Driven Simulation of Demographic Misinformation Susceptibility](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03585/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Coherence-Driven Belief Formation and Population Dynamics of Contagion in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.02654/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Misinformation resilience is a dynamic community process: communities differ not only in whether they initially trust false claims, but also in how they recover through interaction, questioning, correction, and support withdrawal. We study this process with an LLM-based agent simulation that constructs synthetic communities along two theoretically motivated dimensions: Actively Open-minded Thinking (AOT), which captures evidence-seeking and willingness to revise beliefs, and Political Ideology (PI), which captures identity-based interpretation of contested claims. These two traits allow us to examine how evidence-oriented reasoning and ideological alignment jointly shape community responses to credible misinformation shocks. Across systematically varied AOT-PI communities, we find that higher AOT improves both resistance to misinformation uptake and recovery after trust peaks. PI shapes the recovery pathway: ideologically moderate communities recover more reliably, while polarized communities retain more residual support. Stance-level analysis shows that resilience depends on whether agents move from questioning a claim to denying or correcting it and withdrawing prior support. Intervention experiments further show that persuasion and fact checking better support post-peak correction, whereas accuracy prompts mainly induce early caution and source warnings have weaker effects. Together, this work provides a mechanism-level account of community misinformation resilience, showing how psychological composition and intervention design shape whether communities move from misinformation exposure toward correction or persistent support.