# How do Humans Process AI-generated Hallucination Contents: a Neuroimaging Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16953 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16953/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03629/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.00661/) (2020)
- [SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08896/) (2023)
- [The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17421/) (2023)
- [Object Hallucination in Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.02156/) (2018)
- [Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06196/) (2024)
- [AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07397/) (2023)
- [Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13165/) (2023)
- [Unsupervised Real-Time Hallucination Detection based on the Internal States of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06448/) (2024)
- [Generated Faces in the Wild: Quantitative Comparison of Stable Diffusion, Midjourney and DALL-E 2](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00586/) (2022)
- [Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and Inconsistencies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.08554/) (2025)
- [Toward cross-subject and cross-session generalization in EEG-based emotion recognition: Systematic review, taxonomy, and methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08744/) (2022)
- [So Cloze yet so Far: N400 Amplitude is Better Predicted by Distributional Information than Human Predictability Judgements](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01226/) (2021)
- [MemEye: A Visual-Centric Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Agent Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15128/) (2026)
- [Towards a Better Understanding Human Reading Comprehension with Brain Signals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.01360/) (2021)
- [BrainLLM: Generative Language Decoding from Brain Recordings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09889/) (2023)
- [AEL: Evolving Agent Harness in Open-Ended Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21725/) (2026)
- [Relevance Feedback with Brain Signals](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.05669/) (2023)
- [Steering the Verifiability of Multimodal AI Hallucinations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06714/) (2026)
- [CrossPT-EEG: A Benchmark for Cross-Participant and Cross-Time Generalization of EEG-based Visual Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07151/) (2024)
- [Understanding the Effect of Opinion Polarization in Short Video Browsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04184/) (2024)
- [I Think, Therefore I Hallucinate: Minds, Machines, and the Art of Being Wrong](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05806/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While AI-generated hallucinations pose considerable risks, the underlying cognitive mechanisms by which humans can successfully recognize or be misled by these hallucinations remain unclear. To address this problem, this paper explores humans' neural dynamics to characterize how the brain processes hallucinated content. We record EEG signals from 27 participants while they are performing a verification task to judge the correctness of image descriptions generated by a multi-modal large language model (MLLM). Based on an averaged event-related potential (ERP) study, we reveal that multiple cognitive processes, e.g., semantic integration, inferential processing, memory retrieval, and cognitive load, exhibit distinct patterns when humans process hallucinated versus non-hallucinated content. Notably, neural responses to hallucinations that were misjudged versus correctly judged by human participants showed significant differences. This indicates that misjudged AI-generated hallucinations failed to trigger the standard neurocognitive fact verification pathway.