# PaliBench: A Multi-Reference Blueprint for Classical Language Translation Benchmarks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16881 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.16881/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 44 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08771/) (2018)
- [No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.04672/) (2022)
- [Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05176/) (2025)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03193/) (2021)
- [How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09210/) (2023)
- [xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10482/) (2023)
- [Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Engine](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08745/) (2023)
- [GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13988/) (2023)
- [Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation in Many Languages via Zero-Shot Paraphrasing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14564/) (2020)
- [Latin BERT: A Contextual Language Model for Classical Philology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10053/) (2020)
- [One Model is All You Need: ByT5-Sanskrit, a Unified Model for Sanskrit NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.13920/) (2024)
- [MITRA: A Large-Scale Parallel Corpus and Multilingual Pretrained Language Model for Machine Translation and Semantic Retrieval for P=ali, Sanskrit, Buddhist Chinese, and Tibetan](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06400/) (2026)
- [Learning from Many Voices: Literary MT Using Multi-Reference Human and Synthetic Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18707/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Can We Triage LLM Translation Errors in Classical Texts Without Human References? Source Novelty, GEMBA Scoring, and Budgeted Review through Pali-to-English Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.14963/) (2026)
- [When Do Agents Help? Embedding, LLM and Agentic Alignment of Classical Texts and Their Translations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.33691/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Digital humanities projects increasingly rely on machine translation and large language models to widen access to classical, religious, and otherwise under-translated textual traditions. Yet standard translation benchmarks are poorly suited to such materials: they typically compare a system output against a single reference translation, even though classical texts often support multiple faithful renderings that differ in terminology, register, and interpretation. This article introduces PaliBench, both a benchmark for Pali-to-English translation and a reusable method for constructing multi-reference translation benchmarks for classical languages. The Pali case study draws on passages from the Sutta Pitaka aligned with independent English translations by Bhikkhu Sujato, Bhikkhu Thanissaro, and Bhikkhu Bodhi. The workflow combines LLM-assisted alignment of independently segmented translations, automated verification against source files, passage-level quality filtering, deduplication of formulaic repetitions, and multi-metric evaluation against multiple human references. The resulting benchmark contains 1,700 passages spanning 8,389 segments and approximately 345,000 tokens. We use it to evaluate ten contemporary large language models with complementary metrics, finding strong cross-metric concordance in system rankings alongside substantial variation in reliability and semantic outlier rates. The broader contribution is methodological: PaliBench shows how existing scholarly translations can be transformed into evaluation infrastructure for interpretive textual traditions without treating any single translation as definitive. Although developed for Pali Buddhist texts, the approach could be portable to other classical corpora where sufficient independent reference translations exist.