# Feedback World Model Enables Precise Guidance of Diffusion Policy

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15705 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15705/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Embodied and robot world models, one of 11 directions in World models.
- Builds on 26 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.

## Placed in

- World models / [Embodied and robot world models](https://mlsanity.com/wm/embodied-and-robot-world-models/)
- Diffusion models / [Diffusion and flow policies for robotics](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-and-flow-policies-for-robotics/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05233/) (2021)
- [Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05600/) (2019)
- [Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04137/) (2023)
- [Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imagination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01603/) (2019)
- [Learning Latent Dynamics for Planning from Pixels](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.04551/) (2018)
- [Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09991/) (2022)
- [Mastering Atari with Discrete World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02193/) (2020)
- [What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.03298/) (2021)
- [World Action Models are Zero-shot Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15922/) (2026)
- [DINO-WM: World Models on Pre-trained Visual Features enable Zero-shot Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04983/) (2024)
- [Fast-WAM: Do World Action Models Need Test-time Future Imagination?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16666/) (2026)
- [LIBERO-Plus: In-depth Robustness Analysis of Vision-Language-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13626/) (2025)
- [VLA-JEPA: Enhancing Vision-Language-Action Model with Latent World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.10098/) (2026)
- [Steering Your Generalists: Improving Robotic Foundation Models via Value Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.13816/) (2024)
- [World Model for Robot Learning: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00080/) (2026)
- [DynaGuide: Steering Diffusion Polices with Active Dynamic Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13922/) (2025)
- [Finetuning Offline World Models in the Real World](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16029/) (2023)
- [World-VLA-Loop: Closed-Loop Learning of Video World Model and VLA Policy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.06508/) (2026)
- [World Guidance: World Modeling in Condition Space for Action Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.22010/) (2026)
- [Latent Policy Barrier: Learning Robust Visuomotor Policies by Staying In-Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05941/) (2025)
- [AtomVLA: Scalable Post-Training for Robotic Manipulation via Predictive Latent World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08519/) (2026)
- [Action-to-Action Flow Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07322/) (2026)
- [ProgressVLA: Progress-Guided Diffusion Policy for Vision-Language Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.27670/) (2026)
- [Feedback Favors the Generalization of Neural ODEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10253/) (2024)
- [DDP-WM: Disentangled Dynamics Prediction for Efficient World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01780/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [World Action Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20781/) (2026)
- [ω-EVA: Envision, Verify, and Act with Latent Interactive World Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09457/) (2026)
- [FBFM: A Training-Free Asynchronous Feedback Mechanism for Flow-Matching in World-Action Models Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.29235/) (2026)
- [Dueling World Models: Advantage-Style Action Channels for Common-Mode Distractor Rejection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.06706/) (2026)
- [World Models for Embodied Intelligence: From Plausible to Controllable to Actionable](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.16697/) (2026)
- [FuncBridge: Towards Functional Tool-Use Generalization via Keypoint Trajectory Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.05780/) (2026)
- [When World Models Lie: Adaptive Safety Analysis Under Wrong Imaginations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34300/) (2026)
- [Revision, Not Restart: Revisable Visual Plans for Closed-Loop World-Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35439/) (2026)
- [Learning Skills from Historical Action Trajectories: Action Experience Dictionary for World Action Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.40219/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

World models aim to improve robotic decision making by predicting the consequences of actions. However, in practice, their predictions often become unreliable once the robot encounters states outside the training distribution, limiting their effectiveness at deployment. We observe that execution itself provides a natural but underutilized signal: after each action, the robot directly observes the true next state, revealing the mismatch between predicted and actual outcomes. Building on this insight, we propose feedback world model, a new paradigm that closes the loop between prediction and observation at inference time. Instead of treating the world model as a static open-loop predictor, our method maintains a lightweight feedback state that is updated online to iteratively correct future predictions, compensating for model errors using real-time observations without additional training data or parameter updates. We show that this process can be interpreted as a latent-space observer and admits convergence guarantees under mild conditions. We further introduce action-aware guidance to better translate corrected predictions into control by emphasizing action-controllable components while suppressing irrelevant variations. Experiments on LIBERO-Plus, Robomimic, and real-world manipulation tasks demonstrate that our method substantially improves both prediction accuracy and policy performance under distribution shift. In particular, it reduces world model prediction error by up to 76.4% and improves out-of-distribution (OOD) success rate by 30%. These results show that incorporating real-time feedback at inference time provides a simple yet powerful alternative to static world modeling.
