# Pretraining Objective Matters in Extreme Low-Data FGVC: A Backbone-Controlled Study

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15599 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15599/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability.
- Builds on 7 of its 11 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Mechanistic interpretability / [Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/sparse-autoencoder-training-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06377/) (2021)
- [Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14294/) (2021)
- [Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hypersphere](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.10242/) (2020)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [ConvNet vs Transformer, Supervised vs CLIP: Beyond ImageNet Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09215/) (2023)
- [Understanding Deep Neural Networks via Linear Separability of Hidden Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13962/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Extreme low-data fine-grained classification is common in expert domains where labeling is expensive, yet practitioners still need principled guidance for selecting pretrained encoders. We study emerald inclusion grading with a custom dataset of labeled images across three classes and ask: under matched backbone capacity, how does pretraining objective affect downstream representation quality? We compare four frozen ViT-B/16 encoders trained with supervised classification, contrastive learning (SigLIP2), masked reconstruction (MAE), and self-distillation (DINOv3), and evaluate them with leave-one-out cross-validation using linear and nonlinear probes. To control statistical noise in the low-N regime, we use permutation testing (N=1000) on macro one-vs-rest AUC. Supervised and contrastive encoders provide the strongest linear separability (logistic AUC: 0.768 and 0.735; SVM AUC: 0.739 and 0.697), while MAE improves under nonlinear probes (XGBoost AUC: 0.713). We find that DINOv3 underperforms across probe families in this domain. These results support a practical recommendation for extreme low-data FGVC: prioritize margin-enforcing pretraining objectives when data scarcity restricts probing to linear decision rules, and consider reconstruction-style encoders when nonlinear classifiers are feasible given dataset constraints.