# U-SEG: Uncertainty in SEGmentation -- A systematic multi-variable exploration

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15421 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15421/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 58 of its 86 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 58)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.14030/) (2021)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1411.4038/) (2014)
- [Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02142/) (2015)
- [The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1604.01685/) (2016)
- [Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01474/) (2016)
- [Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.04159/) (2020)
- [RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.12039/) (2020)
- [Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01527/) (2021)
- [Panoptic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.00868/) (2018)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning that Matters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.06560/) (2017)
- [Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertainty](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01768/) (2018)
- [Simple Copy-Paste is a Strong Data Augmentation Method for Instance Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07177/) (2020)
- [Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07998/) (2021)
- [Panoptic-DeepLab](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.04751/) (2019)
- [Visual Attention Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.09741/) (2022)
- [Deep Deterministic Uncertainty: A Simple Baseline](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.11582/) (2021)
- [Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.01653/) (2022)
- [Playing for Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.07322/) (2017)
- [Epistemic Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.08924/) (2021)
- [A Generalist Framework for Panoptic Segmentation of Images and Videos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06366/) (2022)
- [Model Ratatouille: Recycling Diverse Models for Out-of-Distribution Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10445/) (2022)
- [Uncertainty Quantification and Confidence Calibration in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15850/) (2025)
- [Stronger, Fewer, & Superior: Harnessing Vision Foundation Models for Domain Generalized Semantic Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.04265/) (2023)
- [Semantic Segmentation using Vision Transformers: A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03273/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In this study, we explore in depth a few under-studied topics at the intersection of uncertainty estimation and segmentation. Prior work has shown that the quality of uncertainty estimates can be very sensitive to a range of variables. As one of the main uses of uncertainty estimation is to help identify and deal with prediction errors in practical scenarios, any factors that affect this must be clearly identified. For example, do more challenging domains or different datasets and architectures result in worse performance when using uncertainty estimates? Can prior frames in a video sequence in fact provide useful uncertainty estimates comparable to other approaches? Is it possible to combine uncertainty estimation approaches, taking advantage of sample diversity, to get better estimates? Finally, when might it make sense to use an ensemble-based uncertainty estimate over a deterministic network? We address these questions by creating a framework for and executing a large scale study across many variables such as datasets, backbones, and downstream tasks, for both semantic and panoptic segmentation. We find that a) the more challenging task of panoptic segmentation usually results in worse performance while high performance variance between datasets and backbones indicates that generalization is not guaranteed, b) time series samples can be useful for specific configurations, but in many cases are not worth the cost, c) sample diversity shows the most promise in the downstream task of calibration, but otherwise fails to beat simpler alternatives, d) a deterministic approach is adequate for some downstream tasks, but ensembles allow for significant improvements if the right conditions can be achieved in deployment.
