# Lagrangian Flow Matching: A Least-Action Framework for Principled Path Design

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15419 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15419/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Flow matching, time series and science](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/flow-matching-time-series-and-science/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Neural Ordinary Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07366/) (2018)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15571/) (2022)
- [Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08797/) (2023)
- [Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00482/) (2023)
- [Maximum Likelihood Training of Score-Based Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.09258/) (2021)
- [Diffusion Schr"odinger Bridge with Applications to Score-Based Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01357/) (2021)
- [A survey of the Schr"odinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1308.0215/) (2013)
- [Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14772/) (2023)
- [On the relation between optimal transport and Schr"odinger bridges: A stochastic control viewpoint](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.4430/) (2014)
- [Action Matching: Learning Stochastic Dynamics from Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.06662/) (2022)
- [A Computational Framework for Solving Wasserstein Lagrangian Flows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10649/) (2023)
- [Energy Matching: Unifying Flow Matching and Energy-Based Models for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10612/) (2025)
- [Neural Optimal Transport with Lagrangian Costs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00288/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [What Does a Stream Model Buy You in Flow Matching?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34123/) (2026)
- [Graph-Spectral Flow Matching for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36765/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Flow matching trains a neural velocity field by regression against a target velocity associated with a prescribed probability path connecting a simple initial distribution to the data distribution. A central design choice is the path itself. Existing constructions, including rectified and optimal-transport-based paths, transport samples along straight lines between coupled endpoints and thus cover only a narrow class of dynamics. We observe that this corresponds to the simplest case of the least-action principle in classical mechanics, in which the kinetic Lagrangian yields free-particle straight-line trajectories. Building on this observation, we propose Lagrangian flow matching, a physics-based framework in which the probability path and velocity field are determined by minimizing the action of a general Lagrangian subject to the continuity equation and the prescribed endpoints. We show that this dynamic problem admits an equivalent static optimal transport (OT) formulation, yielding a family of simulation-free training objectives that recover OT-based flow matching as the kinetic special case and the trigonometric variance-preserving diffusion path as the harmonic-oscillator case. More general Lagrangians give rise to new probability paths and velocity fields, and numerical experiments show that they induce meaningful changes in the learned dynamics while remaining competitive with existing conditional flow matching models.