# Assistance to Autonomy: A Systematic Literature Review of Agentic AI across the Software Development Life Cycle

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15245 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.15245/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06590/) (2023)
- [Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02977/) (2024)
- [AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.10468/) (2025)
- [LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision and the Road Ahead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04834/) (2024)
- [Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09089/) (2025)
- [Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Collaboration Networks for Software Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16946/) (2024)
- [Evaluating the Code Quality of AI-Assisted Code Generation Tools: An Empirical Study on GitHub Copilot, Amazon CodeWhisperer, and ChatGPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10778/) (2023)
- [Agents in Software Engineering: Survey, Landscape, and Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.09030/) (2024)
- [Generative to Agentic AI: Survey, Conceptualization, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.18875/) (2025)
- [AI-assisted Code Authoring at Scale: Fine-tuning, deploying, and mixed methods evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12050/) (2023)
- [RGD: Multi-LLM Based Agent Debugger via Refinement and Generation Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01242/) (2024)
- [GoNoGo: An Efficient LLM-based Multi-Agent System for Streamlining Automotive Software Release Decision-Making](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.09785/) (2024)
- [LatteReview: A Multi-Agent Framework for Systematic Review Automation Using Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.05468/) (2025)
- [Automated structural testing of LLM-based agents: methods, framework, and case studies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18827/) (2026)
- [Agentic RAG for Software Testing with Hybrid Vector-Graph and Multi-Agent Orchestration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10824/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic AI in software product development is increasingly adopted by organizations, yet the field lacks a consolidated synthesis of where adoption is mature, which architectural patterns dominate, and what limitations and coping mechanisms exist in industrial deployments. This systematic literature review addresses these gaps by establishing a body of knowledge as a starting point. Following Kitchenham guidelines, we queried four major research databases, obtaining over 1600 candidate publications. To handle this volume, we developed and validated a domain-agnostic multi-agent screening pipeline that extends prior LLM-assisted review tools by combining automatic metadata curation, inter-agent iterative dialogue, and conflict-resolution defaults that minimize false negatives. From the 92 manually verified primary studies, our thematic synthesis reveals that output verifiability is the primary enabler of agentic adoption: later SDLC phases, whose outputs are objectively evaluable through executable feedback, demonstrate the highest maturity and industrial presence, while earlier phases remain almost exclusively academic proofs-of-concept. We identify the Planner-Executor-Reviewer role specialization as the dominant architectural pattern, with the Reviewer agent implementing verifiability through executable feedback loops. Across all challenge categories, industrial mitigation strategies converge on confining agent actions to verifiable, bounded spaces. This study contributes a comprehensive characterization of the current literature on agentic systems in software product development, and a methodological contribution in the form of an AI-assisted tool to automate the screening phase in high-volume SLR domains.