# Stateful Reasoning via Insight Replay

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14457 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.14457/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 26 of its 32 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/prompting-and-chain-of-thought-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 26 of 26)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09864/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23281/) (2025)
- [TokenSkip: Controllable Chain-of-Thought Compression in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12067/) (2025)
- [When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07266/) (2025)
- [Thought Anchors: Which LLM Reasoning Steps Matter?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19143/) (2025)
- [C3oT: Generating Shorter Chain-of-Thought without Compromising Effectiveness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11664/) (2024)
- [Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06205/) (2024)
- [Critical Tokens Matter: Token-Level Contrastive Estimation Enhances LLM's Reasoning Capability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.19943/) (2024)
- [InftyThink: Breaking the Length Limits of Long-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06692/) (2025)
- [Inverse Scaling in Test-Time Compute](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14417/) (2025)
- [Making Slow Thinking Faster: Compressing LLM Chain-of-Thought via Step Entropy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.03346/) (2025)
- [PENCIL: Long Thoughts with Short Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14337/) (2025)
- [Think Deep, Not Just Long: Measuring LLM Reasoning Effort via Deep-Thinking Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13517/) (2026)
- [Rethinking Thinking Tokens: LLMs as Improvement Operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01123/) (2025)
- [Not All Tokens Are What You Need In Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17827/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has become a foundation for eliciting multi-step reasoning in large language models, but recent studies show that its benefits do not scale monotonically with chain length: while longer CoT generally enables a model to tackle harder problems, on a given problem, accuracy typically increases with CoT length up to a point, after which it declines. We identify a major cause of this phenomenon: as the CoT grows, the model's attention to critical insights produced earlier in the trace gradually weakens, making those insights progressively less accessible when they are most needed. Therefore, we propose InsightReplay, a stateful reasoning approach in which the model periodically extracts critical insights from its reasoning trace and replays them near the active generation frontier, keeping them accessible as the reasoning scales. Extensive experiments on a 2!×!3!×!4 benchmark grid, covering model scales 8B, 30B, model families Qwen3.5, DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen, Gemma-4, and reasoning benchmarks AIME, HMMT, GPQA Diamond, LiveCodeBench v5, show that 3-round InsightReplay yields accuracy gains across all 24 settings, with an averaged improvement of +1.65 points over standard CoT, and a largest single-setting gain of +9.2 points on R1-Distill-32B's LiveCodeBench v5 subset. Our results suggest that the effectiveness of test-time scaling depends not only on how much a model reasons, but also on whether critical intermediate insights remain accessible throughout long reasoning trajectories.