# When Attention Closes: How LLMs Lose the Thread in Multi-Turn Interaction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12922 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12922/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 30 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09864/) (2021)
- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05150/) (2020)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03961/) (2021)
- [Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17453/) (2023)
- [Mixtral of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04088/) (2024)
- [Big Bird: Transformers for Longer Sequences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14062/) (2020)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.01644/) (2016)
- [GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpoints](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13245/) (2023)
- [RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06654/) (2024)
- [Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.12409/) (2021)
- [Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12452/) (2021)
- [Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Positional Interpolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15595/) (2023)
- [Fast Transformer Decoding: One Write-Head is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.02150/) (2019)
- [The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06824/) (2023)
- [τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07982/) (2025)
- [YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00071/) (2023)
- [LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.06120/) (2025)
- [MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14762/) (2024)
- [When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical View](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.10781/) (2024)
- [Round and Round We Go! What makes Rotary Positional Encodings useful?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06205/) (2024)
- [Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15553/) (2024)
- [MT-Eval: A Multi-Turn Capabilities Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.16745/) (2024)
- [Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same Coin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06477/) (2025)
- [One Battle After Another: Probing LLMs' Limits on Multi-Turn Instruction Following with a Benchmark Evolving Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.03508/) (2025)
- [Dynamic Context Adaptation for Consistent Role-Playing Agents with Retrieval-Augmented Generations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.02016/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [MAIGO: Mitigating Lost-in-Conversation with History-Cleaned On-Policy Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.27186/) (2026)
- [Measuring What Persists: Conditioning Mechanisms and a Geometric Framework for AI Agent Identity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.21843/) (2026)
- [Geometry of Divergence: Tracking Hidden-State Trajectories for Adaptive Multi-Turn Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.30650/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models can follow complex instructions in a single turn, yet over long multi-turn interactions they often lose the thread of instructions, persona, and rules. This degradation has been measured behaviorally but not mechanistically explained. We propose a channel-transition account: goal-defining tokens become less accessible through attention, while goal-related information may persist in residual representations. We introduce the Goal Accessibility Ratio (GAR), measuring attention from generated tokens to task-defining goal tokens, and combine it with sliding-window ablations and residual-stream probes. When attention to instructions closes, what survives reveals architecture. Across architectures, the transition yields qualitatively distinct failure modes: some models preserve goal-conditioned behavior at vanishing attention, others fail despite decodable residual goal information, and the layer at which this encoding emerges varies from 2 to 27. A within-model causal ablation that force-closes the attention channel in Mistral collapses recall from near-perfect to 11% on a 20-fact retention task and raises persona-constraint violations above an adversarial-pressure baseline without user pressure, with both effects emerging at the predictable crossover turn. Linear probes recover per-episode recall outcomes from residual representations with AUC up to 0.99 across all four primary architectures, while input embeddings remain at chance. Across architectures and model scales, the gap between attention loss and residual decodability predicts whether goal-conditioned behavior survives channel closure. We contribute GAR as a diagnostic, the channel-transition framework as a controlled mechanistic account, and a parametric prediction of failure timing under windowed attention closure.