# Revisiting DAgger in the Era of LLM-Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12913 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12913/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for LLM agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 45 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 13 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Reinforcement learning for LLM agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/reinforcement-learning-for-llm-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06261/) (2025)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14196/) (2024)
- [OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16741/) (2024)
- [On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13649/) (2023)
- [BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12516/) (2025)
- [Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18734/) (2026)
- [Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06295/) (2015)
- [Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10620/) (2023)
- [Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.17746/) (2025)
- [Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gym](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21139/) (2024)
- [Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20802/) (2026)
- [SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.21798/) (2025)
- [CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.07339/) (2024)
- [SWE-Bench Pro: Can AI Agents Solve Long-Horizon Software Engineering Tasks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16941/) (2025)
- [SWE-RL: Advancing LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning on Open Software Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18449/) (2025)
- [BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06600/) (2025)
- [Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.02977/) (2024)
- [Multi-SWE-bench: A Multilingual Benchmark for Issue Resolving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.02605/) (2025)
- [Software Testing with Large Language Models: Survey, Landscape, and Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.07221/) (2023)
- [SWE-rebench: An Automated Pipeline for Task Collection and Decontaminated Evaluation of Software Engineering Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20411/) (2025)
- [Practical Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.14179/) (2022)
- [Reinforcement and Imitation Learning via Interactive No-Regret Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1406.5979/) (2014)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [RISE: Recursive Improvement via Self-Extrapolating Policy Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.05295/) (2026)
- [A Few Teacher Steps Go a Long Way: Cost-Efficient On-Policy Data Augmentation for Agent Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.04574/) (2026)
- [PUBG Ally: A Conversational Embodied Agent as an AI Teammate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29837/) (2026)
- [Learning from Teacher Continuations at Student States](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36246/) (2026)
- [Distilling Agentic Systems: A Roadmap across Models, Artifacts, and Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.36630/) (2026)
- [Beyond Corrected Actions: Training LLM Agents on Textual Critiques](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19367/) (2026)
- [Teaching Agents in their Own Style: Blackbox Teacher Distillation for Web Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19834/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Long-horizon LM agents learn from multi-turn interaction, where a single early mistake can alter the subsequent state distribution and derail the whole trajectory. Existing recipes fall short in complementary ways: supervised fine-tuning provides dense teacher supervision but suffers from covariate shift because it is trained on off-policy teacher trajectories; while reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards avoids this off-policy mismatch by learning from on-policy rollouts but with only sparse outcome feedback. We address this dilemma by revisiting Dataset Aggregation (DAgger) for multi-turn LM agents: the algorithm collects trajectories through a turn-level interpolation of student and teacher policies, and the student is then trained on these trajectories using supervised labels provided by the teacher. By directly interacting with environments, we expose the model to realistic states likely to be encountered during deployment, thereby effectively mitigating covariate shift. Besides, since the student is learned by mimicking the teacher's behavior, it receives rich feedback during learning. To demonstrate DAgger enjoys the benefits of both worlds, we tested the algorithm to train a software-engineering agent with 4B- and 8B-scale student models. On SWE-bench Verified, our DAgger-style training improves over the strongest post-training baseline by +3.9 points at 4B and +3.6 points at 8B. The resulting 4B agent reaches 27.3%, outperforming representative published 8B SWE-agent systems, while the 8B agent achieves 29.8%, surpassing SWE-Gym-32B and coming within 5 points of stronger 32B-scale agents. Together with consistent gains on the held-out SWE-Gym split, these results suggest the effectiveness of DAgger for modern long-horizon LM agents.