# Can LLM Agents Respond to Disasters? Benchmarking Heterogeneous Geospatial Reasoning in Emergency Operations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11633 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11633/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 38 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 12 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)
- LLM agents and tool use / [Multimodal and embodied agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/multimodal-and-embodied-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.13854/) (2023)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.07972/) (2024)
- [GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12983/) (2023)
- [ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10144/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02556/) (2025)
- [Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01030/) (2024)
- [ReasoningBank: Scaling Agent Self-Evolving with Reasoning Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.25140/) (2025)
- [SWE-bench Multimodal: Do AI Systems Generalize to Visual Software Domains?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03859/) (2024)
- [ReWOO: Decoupling Reasoning from Observations for Efficient Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18323/) (2023)
- [xBD: A Dataset for Assessing Building Damage from Satellite Imagery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.09296/) (2019)
- [OpenEarthMap: A Benchmark Dataset for Global High-Resolution Land Cover Mapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10732/) (2022)
- [GTA: A Benchmark for General Tool Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08713/) (2024)
- [AutoGuide: Automated Generation and Selection of Context-Aware Guidelines for Large Language Model Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.08978/) (2024)
- [Change-Agent: Towards Interactive Comprehensive Remote Sensing Change Interpretation and Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19646/) (2024)
- [The Multi-Temporal Urban Development SpaceNet Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.04420/) (2021)
- [Plan-Then-Execute: An Empirical Study of User Trust and Team Performance When Using LLM Agents As A Daily Assistant](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01390/) (2025)
- [RS-Agent: Automating Remote Sensing Tasks through Intelligent Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07089/) (2024)
- [ThinkGeo: Evaluating Tool-Augmented Agents for Remote Sensing Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23752/) (2025)
- [Earth-Agent: Unlocking the Full Landscape of Earth Observation with Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23141/) (2025)
- [BRIGHT: A globally distributed multimodal building damage assessment dataset with very-high-resolution for all-weather disaster response](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.06019/) (2025)
- [RescueNet: A High Resolution UAV Semantic Segmentation Benchmark Dataset for Natural Disaster Damage Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12361/) (2022)
- [m&m's: A Benchmark to Evaluate Tool-Use for multi-step multi-modal Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11085/) (2024)
- [DisasterM3: A Remote Sensing Vision-Language Dataset for Disaster Damage Assessment and Response](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21089/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [LLM-based Agents for Forecasting and Prediction: Methods, Training, Evaluation, and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23058/) (2026)
- [EarthVerse: Benchmarking Scientific Agents Across Dynamic Earth Systems and Natural Hazards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23525/) (2026)
- [Earth-Agent-Pro: Towards Real-World Full-Chain Earth Observation with Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.12533/) (2026)
- [HazardWeaver: Scientific Route Selection for Hazard Analysis Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.03591/) (2026)
- [AI4Fire: Evaluating Large Language Models on Wildfire Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.10946/) (2026)
- [Trust Before Autonomy: Rethinking Agentic Remote Sensing for Crisis Response](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18789/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Operational disaster response goes beyond damage assessment, requiring responders to integrate multi-sensor signals, reason over road networks, populations and key facilities, plan evacuations, and produce actionable reports. However, prior work largely isolates remote-sensing perception or evaluates generic tool use, leaving the end-to-end workflows of emergency operations underexplored. In this paper, we introduce Disaster Operational Response Agent benchmark (DORA), the first agentic benchmark for end-to-end disaster response: 515 expert-authored tasks across 45 real-world disaster events spanning 10 types, paired with expert-verified, replayable gold trajectories totaling 3,500 tool-call steps. Tasks span five dimensions that cover the operational disaster-response pipeline: disaster perception, spatial relational analysis, rescue and evacuation planning, temporal evolution reasoning, and multi-modal report synthesis. Agents compose calls from a 108-tool MCP library over heterogeneous geospatial data: optical, SAR, and multi-spectral imagery across single-, bi-, and multi-temporal sequences (0.015-10m GSD), complemented by elevation and social vector layers. We comprehensively evaluate 13 frontier LLMs on our benchmark, revealing three persistent challenges: 1) disaster-domain grounding exposes unique failure modes (damage-semantic grounding, sensor-modality mismatch, and disaster-pipeline composition); 2) agents are doubly bottlenecked by tool selection and argument grounding, where gold tool-order hints improve accuracy by only 1.08-4.40%, and alternative scaffolds yield at most a 3.24% gain; 3) compositional fragility scales with trajectory length, the agent-to-gold gap widening from 7% to 56% on long pipelines. DORA establishes a rigorous testbed for operationally reliable disaster-response agents.