# Predicting Psychological Well-Being from Spontaneous Speech using LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11303 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11303/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 8 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 8 of 8)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04356/) (2022)
- [Qwen2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10671/) (2024)
- [Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.00118/) (2024)
- [Artificial Intelligence, speech and language processing approaches to monitoring Alzheimer's Disease: a systematic review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.06047/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models for Mental Health Diagnostic Assessments: Exploring The Potential of Large Language Models for Assisting with Mental Health Diagnostic Assessments -- The Depression and Anxiety Case](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01305/) (2025)
- [Large Language Models for Depression Recognition in Spoken Language Integrating Psychological Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22863/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for zero-shot prediction of Ryff Psychological Well-Being (PWB) scores from spontaneous speech. Using a few minutes of voice recordings from 111 participants in the PsyVoiD database, we evaluated 12 instruction-tuned LLMs, including Llama-3 (8B, 70B), Ministral, Mistral, Gemma-2-9B, Gemma-3 (1B, 4B, 27B), Phi-4, DeepSeek (Qwen and Llama), and QwQ-Preview. A domain-informed prompt was developed in collaboration with experts in clinical psychology and linguistics. Results show that LLMs can extract semantically meaningful cues from spontaneous speech, achieving Spearman correlations of up to 0.8 on 80% of the data. Additionally, to enhance explainability, we conducted statistical analyses to characterise prediction variability and systematic biases, alongside keyword-based word cloud analyses to highlight the linguistic features driving the models' predictions.