# TMPO: Trajectory Matching Policy Optimization for Diverse and Efficient Diffusion Alignment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10983 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10983/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 46 of its 53 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion and flow policies for robotics](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-and-flow-policies-for-robotics/)
- LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation / [Diffusion and multimodal model alignment](https://mlsanity.com/alignment/diffusion-and-multimodal-model-alignment/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 46)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.02502/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.07193/) (2023)
- [Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09748/) (2022)
- [Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.12598/) (2022)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10760/) (2022)
- [ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05977/) (2023)
- [Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13301/) (2023)
- [Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01569/) (2023)
- [GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.11513/) (2023)
- [Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08797/) (2023)
- [DPM-Solver++: Fast Solver for Guided Sampling of Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.01095/) (2022)
- [Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09341/) (2023)
- [Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05470/) (2025)
- [DPOK: Reinforcement Learning for Fine-tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16381/) (2023)
- [DanceGRPO: Unleashing GRPO on Visual Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.07818/) (2025)
- [Flow Network based Generative Models for Non-Iterative Diverse Candidate Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04399/) (2021)
- [The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03544/) (2022)
- [Trajectory balance: Improved credit assignment in GFlowNets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.13259/) (2022)
- [Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02743/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [ReNFT: Repairing Mode Collapse in Reward Post-Training via Internal Probability-Mass Recalibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.00061/) (2026)
- [Graph Forward Distribution Matching for Molecular Inverse Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32056/) (2026)
- [CapField-OPD: Learning Continuous Capability Fields via Joint-Anchored Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation for Flow Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34658/) (2026)
- [Unified Trajectory Matching Policy Optimization: Diverse T2I Generation and VLA Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.34688/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning (RL) has shown extraordinary potential in aligning diffusion models to downstream tasks, yet most of them still suffer from significant reward hacking, which degrades generative diversity and quality by inducing visual mode collapse and amplifying unreliable rewards. We identify the root cause as the mode-seeking nature of these methods, which maximize expected reward without effectively constraining probability distribution over acceptable trajectories, causing concentration on a few high-reward paths. In contrast, we propose Trajectory Matching Policy Optimization (TMPO), which replaces scalar reward maximization with trajectory-level reward distribution matching. Specifically, TMPO introduces a Softmax Trajectory Balance (Softmax-TB) objective to match the policy probabilities of K trajectories to a reward-induced Boltzmann distribution. We prove that this objective inherits the mode-covering property of forward KL divergence, preserving coverage over all acceptable trajectories while optimizing reward. To further reduce multi-trajectory training time on large-scale flow-matching models, TMPO incorporates Dynamic Stochastic Tree Sampling, where trajectories share denoising prefixes and branch at dynamically scheduled steps, reducing redundant computation while improving training effectiveness. Extensive results across diverse alignment tasks such as human preference, compositional generation and text rendering show that TMPO improves generative diversity over state-of-the-art methods by 9.1%, and achieves competitive performance in all downstream and efficiency metrics, attaining the optimal trade-off between reward and diversity.