# Self-Attention as a Covariance Readout: A Unified View of In-Context Learning and Repetition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10466 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10466/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 12 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 12 of 12)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09751/) (2019)
- [An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02080/) (2021)
- [Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07677/) (2022)
- [What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15661/) (2022)
- [Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.04319/) (2019)
- [Trained Transformers Learn Linear Models In-Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09927/) (2023)
- [Data Distributional Properties Drive Emergent In-Context Learning in Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.05055/) (2022)
- [Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.11916/) (2023)
- [Learning to Break the Loop: Analyzing and Mitigating Repetitions for Neural Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02369/) (2022)
- [A Theoretical Analysis of the Repetition Problem in Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.14660/) (2020)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit two striking and ostensibly unrelated behaviours: in-context learning (ICL) and repetitive generation. In both, the model behaves as though it had summarised the context into a population-level statistic and discarded token-level detail. We ask whether this ``summarisation and forgetting'' can be derived from the attention mechanism itself, and answer in the affirmative. Under stationary, ergodic and elliptical inputs, the softmax attention output converges almost surely to ThetaVSigmaThetaKtopThetaQ xt, where Sigma is the input covariance; the long-context limit is therefore a linear readout of the input's second-order statistics. Two consequences follow. (i) For in-context linear regression, a single softmax head can implement one step of population gradient descent. Stacking such heads with residual connections iterates this update and implements multiple gradient descent steps. (ii) Propagated across an L-layer transformer, this readout drives the terminal hidden state at the parametric 1/t rate to a deterministic function of the current token alone, so that autoregressive generation collapses asymptotically to a first-order Markov chain whose attracting orbits furnish a structural account of repetition and mode collapse. The two phenomena thus emerge as facets of a single covariance-readout principle.