# Agent-ValueBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Agent Values

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10365 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.10365/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 37 of its 149 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 37)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12045/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02556/) (2025)
- [GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15763/) (2026)
- [Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11868/) (2026)
- [Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02276/) (2026)
- [ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05301/) (2023)
- [Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.28052/) (2026)
- [Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14470/) (2024)
- [Memory in the Age of AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.13564/) (2025)
- [Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21460/) (2025)
- [A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07407/) (2025)
- [Can Machines Learn Morality? The Delphi Experiment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07574/) (2021)
- [OpenClaw-RL: Train Any Agent Simply by Talking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10165/) (2026)
- [The Political Preferences of LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01789/) (2024)
- [SkillClaw: Let Skills Evolve Collectively with Agentic Evolver](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08377/) (2026)
- [EnvScaler: Scaling Tool-Interactive Environments for LLM Agent via Programmatic Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.05808/) (2026)
- [Natural-Language Agent Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.25723/) (2026)
- [TRAJECT-Bench:A Trajectory-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.04550/) (2025)
- [Meta Context Engineering via Agentic Skill Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.21557/) (2026)
- [Large Language Model Psychometrics: A Systematic Review of Evaluation, Validation, and Enhancement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08245/) (2025)
- [MetaClaw: Just Talk -- An Agent That Meta-Learns and Evolves in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17187/) (2026)
- [ClawsBench: Evaluating Capability and Safety of LLM Productivity Agents in Simulated Workspaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05172/) (2026)
- [Agents of Chaos](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20021/) (2026)
- [Don't Let the Claw Grip Your Hand: A Security Analysis and Defense Framework for OpenClaw](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.10387/) (2026)
- [Open Rubric System: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with Pairwise Adaptive Rubric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14069/) (2026)
- [LLM Ethics Benchmark: A Three-Dimensional Assessment System for Evaluating Moral Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00853/) (2025)
- [Uncovering Security Threats and Architecting Defenses in Autonomous Agents: A Case Study of OpenClaw](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.12644/) (2026)
- [DeceptionBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for AI Deception Behaviors in Real-world Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.15501/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [TimeEvo: Failure-Driven Self-Evolution of a Time Series Agent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27277/) (2026)
- [AgentHabit: Characterizing Distinct Behaviors of Agents on Everyday Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.32795/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous agents have rapidly matured as task executors and seen widespread deployment via harnesses such as OpenClaw. Safety concerns have rightly drawn growing research attention, and beneath them lie the values silently steering agent behavior. Existing value benchmarks, however, remain confined to LLMs, leaving agent values largely uncharted. From intuitive, empirical, and theoretical vantage points, we show that an agent's values diverge from those of its underlying LLM, and the agentic modality further introduces dataset-, evaluation-, and system-level challenges absent from text-only protocols. We close this gap with Agent-ValueBench, the first benchmark dedicated to agent values. It features 394 executable environments across 16 domains, offering 4,335 value-conflict tasks that cover 28 value systems and 332 dimensions. Every instance is co-synthesized through our purpose-built end-to-end pipeline and curated per-instance by professional psychologists. Each task ships with two pole-aligned golden trajectories whose checkpoints anchor a trajectory-level rubric-based judge. Benchmarking 14 frontier proprietary and open-weights models across 4 mainstream harnesses, we uncover three concerted findings. Agent values first manifest as a Value Tide of cross-model homogeneity beneath interpretable counter-currents. This tide bends non-additively under harness pull, and yet more decisively under deliberate steering via embedded skills. Together these results signal that the agent-alignment lever is shifting from classical model alignment and prompt steering toward harness alignment and skill steering.