# Chebyshev Center-Based Direction Selection for Multi-Objective Optimization and Training PINNs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09975 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09975/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Convex optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01946/) (2021)
- [Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.06782/) (2020)
- [Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04650/) (2018)
- [Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01050/) (2021)
- [When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.14527/) (2020)
- [Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's next](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.05624/) (2022)
- [Conflict-Averse Gradient Descent for Multi-task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14048/) (2021)
- [On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10047/) (2020)
- [A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.10289/) (2022)
- [Efficient training of physics-informed neural networks via importance sampling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.12325/) (2021)
- [Multi-Objective Loss Balancing for Physics-Informed Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.09813/) (2021)
- [PINNacle: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving PDEs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.08827/) (2023)
- [DAS-PINNs: A deep adaptive sampling method for solving high-dimensional partial differential equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.14038/) (2021)
- [Separable Physics-Informed Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15969/) (2023)
- [Failure-informed adaptive sampling for PINNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.00279/) (2022)
- [PINNsFormer: A Transformer-Based Framework For Physics-Informed Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11833/) (2023)
- [ConFIG: Towards Conflict-free Training of Physics Informed Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11104/) (2024)
- [Gradient-Adaptive Policy Optimization: Towards Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.01915/) (2025)
- [Dual Cone Gradient Descent for Training Physics-Informed Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18426/) (2024)
- [MultiAdam: Parameter-wise Scale-invariant Optimizer for Multiscale Training of Physics-informed Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.02816/) (2023)
- [Reward-free Alignment for Conflicting Objectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02495/) (2026)
- [PMGDA: A Preference-based Multiple Gradient Descent Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09492/) (2024)
- [Enhancing Stability of Physics-Informed Neural Network Training Through Saddle-Point Reformulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16008/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are a promising approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs). Their training, however, is often difficult because multiple loss terms induced by PDE residuals and boundary or initial conditions must be optimized simultaneously. To address this difficulty, existing approaches often construct update directions by explicitly enforcing particular desirable properties, such as scale robustness and simultaneous descent. While effective in many cases, such property-by-property designs can make it unclear which conditions are essential, what geometric principle determines the selected update direction, and how different methods are structurally related. In this work, we formulate update-direction selection for PINN training as a Chebyshev-center problem in the dual cone. The proposed formulation selects a normalized direction that maximizes the minimum distance to the cone facets. The resulting formulation admits an efficient dual problem in a much lower-dimensional space and yields a convergence guarantee in the nonconvex setting. It also recovers the key desirable properties targeted by existing approaches without imposing them separately; rather, they follow from the single geometric criterion underlying the formulation. This makes the selected direction interpretable through a single geometric rule and provides a unified basis for systematically comparing related direction-selection methods. Experiments on several PINN benchmarks further demonstrate strong empirical performance of the proposed method.