# Team-Based Self-Play With Dual Adaptive Weighting for Fine-Tuning LLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09922 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09922/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Self-rewarding alignment and self-training, one of 13 directions in Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs.
- Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Synthetic data and self-improvement for LLMs / [Self-rewarding alignment and self-training](https://mlsanity.com/synth/self-rewarding-alignment-and-self-training/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08691/) (2023)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.02054/) (2019)
- [SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14734/) (2024)
- [Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14233/) (2023)
- [RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.00267/) (2023)
- [Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03335/) (2025)
- [KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01306/) (2024)
- [From r to Q^*: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.12358/) (2024)
- [Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13228/) (2024)
- [Self-Play Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00675/) (2024)
- [Advancing LLM Reasoning Generalists with Preference Trees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02078/) (2024)
- [Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14367/) (2024)
- [Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.01951/) (2024)
- [Self-playing Adversarial Language Game Enhances LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10642/) (2024)
- [CREAM: Consistency Regularized Self-Rewarding Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12735/) (2024)
- [Bias Amplification in Language Model Evolution: An Iterated Learning Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04286/) (2024)
- [Safety Alignment via Constrained Knowledge Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18588/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While recent self-training approaches have reduced reliance on human-labeled data for aligning LLMs, they still face critical limitations: (i) sensitivity to synthetic data quality, leading to instability and bias amplification in iterative training; (ii) ineffective optimization due to a diminishing gap between positive and negative responses over successive training iterations. In this paper, we propose Team-based self-Play with dual Adaptive Weighting (TPAW), a novel self-play algorithm designed to improve alignment in a fully self-supervised setting. TPAW adopts a team-based framework in which the current policy model both collaborates with and competes against historical checkpoints, promoting more stable and efficient optimization. To further enhance learning, we design two adaptive weighting mechanisms: (i) a response reweighting scheme that adjusts the importance of target responses, and (ii) a player weighting strategy that dynamically modulates each team member's contribution during training. Initialized from a SFT model, TPAW iteratively refines alignment without requiring additional human supervision. Experimental results demonstrate that TPAW consistently outperforms existing baselines across various base models and LLM benchmarks. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/lab-klc/TPAW.