# Position: Academic Conferences are Potentially Facing Denominator Gaming Caused by Fully Automated Scientific Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09915 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09915/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06292/) (2024)
- [Galactica: A Large Language Model for Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.09085/) (2022)
- [Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.04227/) (2025)
- [GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02819/) (2023)
- [Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18096/) (2025)
- [Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-based Scientific Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.24047/) (2025)
- [From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14111/) (2025)
- [Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.08224/) (2026)
- [A Survey of LLM-based Deep Search Agents: Paradigm, Optimization, Evaluation, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05668/) (2025)
- [Towards Scientific Discovery with Generative AI: Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11427/) (2024)
- [Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.04966/) (2025)
- [SkillProbe: Security Auditing for Emerging Agent Skill Marketplaces via Multi-Agent Collaboration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21019/) (2026)
- [The strain on scientific publishing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15884/) (2023)
- [Adversarial Paraphrasing: A Universal Attack for Humanizing AI-Generated Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07001/) (2025)
- [Paper Copilot: Tracking the Evolution of Peer Review in AI Conferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13201/) (2025)
- [Position: The Current AI Conference Model is Unsustainable! Diagnosing the Crisis of Centralized AI Conference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.04586/) (2025)
- [Stop DDoS Attacking the Research Community with AI-Generated Survey Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.09686/) (2025)
- [PaperDebugger: A Plugin-Based Multi-Agent System for In-Editor Academic Writing, Review, and Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02589/) (2025)
- [Superplatforms Have to Attack AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17861/) (2025)
- [Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.04024/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [The Problem Is the Problem: Towards Scalable Mathematical Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.16977/) (2026)
- [Generative Models Erode Human Temporal Learning Through Market Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06572/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The implicit policy of maintaining relatively stable acceptance rates at top AI conferences, despite exponentially growing submissions, introduces a critical structural vulnerability. This position paper characterizes a new systemic threat we term Agentic Denominator Gaming, in which a malicious actor deploys AI agents to generate and submit a large volume of superficially plausible but low-quality papers. Crucially, their objective is not the acceptance of low-quality papers, but rather to inflate the submission denominator and overwhelm reviewing capacity. Under a relatively stable acceptance rate, this dilution can systematically increase the publication probability of a small, targeted set of legitimate papers. We analyze the practical feasibility of this threat and its broader consequences, including intensified reviewer burnout, degraded review quality, and the emergence of industrialized automated agent mills. Finally, we propose and evaluate a range of mitigation strategies, and argue that durable protection will require system-level policy and incentive reforms, rather than relying primarily on technical detection alone.
