# Sequential Feature Selection for Efficient Landslide Segmentation from Multi-Spectral Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09746 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09746/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.00915/) (2016)
- [UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.10165/) (2018)
- [Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.03237/) (2017)
- [Landslide4Sense: Reference Benchmark Data and Deep Learning Models for Landslide Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00515/) (2022)
- [Landslide Detection and Segmentation Using Remote Sensing Images and Deep Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.16717/) (2023)
- [RMAU-NET: A Residual-Multihead-Attention U-Net Architecture for Landslide Segmentation and Detection from Remote Sensing Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.11143/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Landslide detection from satellite imagery has advanced through deep learning, yet most models rely on large, highly correlated spectral-topographic inputs whose contributions remain poorly understood. The question of which channels are actually necessary has received surprisingly little attention. This matters: redundant or correlated inputs obscure physical interpretability, inflate computational overhead, and can actively degrade model performance through the Hughes Phenomenon. We present a systematic, explainable channel-selection framework for the Landslide4Sense benchmark, combining Sentinel-2 multispectral and ALOS PALSAR terrain data with 16 engineered spectral and structural indices. Rather than relying on conventional single-band drop tests, which evaluate channels in isolation and miss interaction effects, we apply Sequential Forward Floating Selection (SFFS) to iteratively build and prune a candidate feature pool using a lightweight U-Net++ proxy model. Beyond identifying a compact 8-channel subset that matches or exceeds the segmentation F1 of configurations using up to 30 channels, we use the selection process itself to interrogate which spectral and topographic features landslide models genuinely rely on, and what this reveals about the physical cues driving their predictions. We argue that SFFS represents a principled feature selection approach to input design in Earth observation, in contrast to the prevailing practice of appending every available band and hoping the model learns what to ignore.