# Reinforcing Multimodal Reasoning Against Visual Degradation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09262 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09262/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.05862/) (2022)
- [Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.12261/) (2019)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.10244/) (2022)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06749/) (2025)
- [R1-Onevision: Advancing Generalized Multimodal Reasoning through Cross-Modal Formalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10615/) (2025)
- [VL-Rethinker: Incentivizing Self-Reflection of Vision-Language Models with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08837/) (2025)
- [We-Math: Does Your Large Multimodal Model Achieve Human-like Mathematical Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01284/) (2024)
- [LMM-R1: Empowering 3B LMMs with Strong Reasoning Abilities Through Two-Stage Rule-Based RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07536/) (2025)
- [LogicVista: Multimodal LLM Logical Reasoning Benchmark in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04973/) (2024)
- [ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.08967/) (2024)
- [OpenVLThinker: Complex Vision-Language Reasoning via Iterative SFT-RL Cycles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17352/) (2025)
- [Reason-RFT: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Visual Reasoning of Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20752/) (2025)
- [Perception-Aware Policy Optimization for Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.06448/) (2025)
- [Self-Rewarding Vision-Language Model via Reasoning Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.19652/) (2025)
- [NoisyRollout: Reinforcing Visual Reasoning with Data Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13055/) (2025)
- [Automatic Data Augmentation for Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.12862/) (2020)
- [Parallel-R1: Towards Parallel Thinking via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.07980/) (2025)
- [VisualPuzzles: Decoupling Multimodal Reasoning Evaluation from Domain Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10342/) (2025)
- [R1-ShareVL: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models via Share-GRPO](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16673/) (2025)
- [CDE: Curiosity-Driven Exploration for Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.09675/) (2025)
- [Shuffle-R1: Efficient RL framework for Multimodal Large Language Models via Data-centric Dynamic Shuffle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05612/) (2025)
- [Save the Good Prefix: Precise Error Penalization via Process-Supervised RL to Enhance LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.18984/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Align Then Reason: A Multimodal Lip-Sync Judge for Dubbing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00825/) (2026)
- [CARE: Certifying Acceleration for Vision-Language-Action Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08917/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning has significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), yet the resulting policies remain brittle against real-world visual degradations such as blur, compression artifacts, and low-resolution scans. Prior robustness techniques from vision and deep RL rely on static data augmentation or value-based regularization, neither of which transfers cleanly to critic-free RL fine-tuning of autoregressive MLLMs. Reinforcing reasoning against such corruptions is non-trivial: naively injecting degraded views during rollout induces reward poisoning, where perceptual occlusions trigger hallucinated trajectories and destabilize optimization. We propose ROMA, an RL fine-tuning framework that modifies the optimization dynamics to reinforce reasoning against visual degradation while preserving clean-input performance. A dual-forward-pass strategy uses teacher forcing to evaluate corrupted views against clean-image trajectories, avoiding new rollouts on degraded inputs. For distributional consistency, we apply a token-level surrogate KL penalty against the worst-case augmentation; to prevent policy collapse under regularization, an auxiliary policy gradient loss anchored to clean-image advantages preserves a reliable reward signal; and to avoid systematically incorrect invariance, correctness-conditioned regularization restricts enforcement to successful trajectories. On Qwen3-VL 4B/8B across seven multimodal reasoning benchmarks, our method improves robustness by +2.4% on seen and +2.3% on unseen corruptions over GRPO while matching clean accuracy.