# Latency Analysis and Optimization of Alpamayo 1 via Efficient Trajectory Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08975 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08975/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Qwen3-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21631/) (2025)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [Planning-oriented Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10156/) (2022)
- [VAD: Vectorized Scene Representation for Efficient Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12077/) (2023)
- [DriveVLM: The Convergence of Autonomous Driving and Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12289/) (2024)
- [End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.02410/) (2017)
- [TransFuser: Imitation with Transformer-Based Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15997/) (2022)
- [DriveGPT4: Interpretable End-to-end Autonomous Driving via Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01412/) (2023)
- [GPT-Driver: Learning to Drive with GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01415/) (2023)
- [DiffusionDrive: Truncated Diffusion Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15139/) (2024)
- [AutoVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Adaptive Reasoning and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13757/) (2025)
- [EMMA: End-to-End Multimodal Model for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23262/) (2024)
- [ORION: A Holistic End-to-End Autonomous Driving Framework by Vision-Language Instructed Action Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19755/) (2025)
- [FutureSightDrive: Thinking Visually with Spatio-Temporal CoT for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17685/) (2025)
- [Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.15558/) (2025)
- [Senna: Bridging Large Vision-Language Models and End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.22313/) (2024)
- [Alpamayo-R1: Bridging Reasoning and Action Prediction for Generalizable Autonomous Driving in the Long Tail](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.00088/) (2025)
- [DriveTransformer: Unified Transformer for Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07656/) (2025)
- [DeepStack: Deeply Stacking Visual Tokens is Surprisingly Simple and Effective for LMMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04334/) (2024)
- [DiffVLA: Vision-Language Guided Diffusion Planning for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19381/) (2025)
- [AdaThinkDrive: Adaptive Thinking via Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13769/) (2025)
- [AutoDrive-R2: Incentivizing Reasoning and Self-Reflection Capacity for VLA Model in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.01944/) (2025)
- [IRL-VLA: Training an Vision-Language-Action Policy via Reward World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.06571/) (2025)
- [ReasonPlan: Unified Scene Prediction and Decision Reasoning for Closed-loop Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20024/) (2025)
- [ColaVLA: Leveraging Cognitive Latent Reasoning for Hierarchical Parallel Trajectory Planning in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.22939/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reasoning-based end-to-end (E2E) autonomous driving has recently emerged as a promising approach to improving the interpretability of driving decisions as it can generate human-readable reasoning together with predicted trajectories. Such approaches commonly generate multiple trajectories to capture diverse future behaviors, and they fall into two categories: (1) multi-reasoning, where one reasoning sequence is generated per trajectory, and (2) single-reasoning, where a single reasoning is shared across all trajectories. The former offers richer diversity at the cost of redundant computation, while the latter is more efficient but is often assumed to sacrifice diversity. Alpamayo 1, a representative system, adopts the multi-reasoning approach and achieves competitive trajectory prediction performance. However, the efficiency of this design remains largely unexplored, making it a well-motivated subject for investigation. In this paper, we systematically analyze and improve Alpamayo 1 in two ways. First, we reduce inference latency while preserving trajectory diversity by redesigning Alpamayo 1 into a single-reasoning system. Through extensive experiments, we find that replacing multi-reasoning with single-reasoning does not meaningfully degrade trajectory diversity. Second, we accelerate diffusion-based action generation by eliminating inter-block overhead arising from unnecessary copy operations and inefficient kernel execution. Through closed-loop and open-loop experiments, we validate both optimizations, demonstrating a 69.23% reduction in inference latency while maintaining trajectory diversity and prediction quality. These results highlight the importance of jointly analyzing system architecture and runtime execution to improve the efficiency of reasoning-based E2E AD systems.