# Beyond Toy Benchmarks: A Systematic Evaluation of OOD Detection Methods For Plant Pathology Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08618 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08618/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 18 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02136/) (2016)
- [Concrete Problems in AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.06565/) (2016)
- [A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03888/) (2018)
- [Natural Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.07174/) (2019)
- [Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02690/) (2017)
- [Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03759/) (2020)
- [Transformers in Vision: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.01169/) (2021)
- [Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04606/) (2018)
- [Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11334/) (2021)
- [Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.1897/) (2014)
- [Do Deep Generative Models Know What They Don't Know?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.09136/) (2018)
- [Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like One](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03263/) (2019)
- [Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.09325/) (2017)
- [Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.05720/) (2018)
- [OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07242/) (2022)
- [Training OOD Detectors in their Natural Habitats](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03299/) (2022)
- [Feed Two Birds with One Scone: Exploiting Wild Data for Both Out-of-Distribution Generalization and Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09158/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is essential for reliable deployment of deep learning systems, yet the majority of existing methods are evaluated on small, visually homogeneous benchmarks. In this work, we study six OOD detection methods spanning post-hoc scoring, auxiliary objectives, energy-based models, and constrained optimization on the Plant Pathology 2021 dataset, a fine-grained task with natural distribution shifts. Energy-based fine-tuning performs best across OOD settings, improving detection over the softmax baseline while preserving in-distribution accuracy. Analysis shows these gains stem from both a restructuring of the embedding space alongside calibration of the scoring function. We further document practical training instabilities that arise when scaling constrained optimization methods to moderate-sized datasets, findings that are largely absent from existing literature. Our results demonstrate that principled OOD detection is achievable on real-world domain-specific data and that benchmark evaluations alone may not capture the challenges that emerge in practice.