# Biological Plausibility and Representational Alignment of Feedback Alignment in Convolutional Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08564 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08564/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 11 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1412.6980/) (2014)
- [Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00414/) (2019)
- [Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depth](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.15327/) (2020)
- [Assessing the Scalability of Biologically-Motivated Deep Learning Algorithms and Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.04587/) (2018)
- [How Important is Weight Symmetry in Backpropagation?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1510.05067/) (2015)
- [Feedback alignment in deep convolutional networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.06488/) (2018)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The feedback alignment (FA) algorithm offers a biologically plausible alternative to backpropagation (BP) for training neural networks yet notably fails to scale to convolutional architectures. Modifications have been proposed to address this limitation, but at questionable cost to biological plausibility. In this paper, we evaluate five learning algorithms including modified FA and standard BP, applied to the same convolutional architecture with the CIFAR-10 dataset. We provide a tripartite comparative analysis focusing on biological plausibility, interpretability, and computational complexity. Our results indicate that modified FA algorithms converge on internal representations that are structurally similar to those produced by backpropagation. In particular, it appears the functional success of modified FA algorithms may be rooted in their ability to mimic the representational geometry of backpropagation, converging on similar representations despite relying on fundamentally different weight update mechanisms.