# Trajectory-Consistent Flow Matching for Robust Visuomotor Policy Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08511 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08511/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 24 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Diffusion and flow policies for robotics](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/diffusion-and-flow-policies-for-robotics/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00593/) (2016)
- [Scaling Rectified Flow Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03206/) (2024)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.04137/) (2023)
- [π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.24164/) (2024)
- [FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.07871/) (2017)
- [DPM-Solver: A Fast ODE Solver for Diffusion Probabilistic Model Sampling in Around 10 Steps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.00927/) (2022)
- [Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13705/) (2023)
- [Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.10897/) (2019)
- [Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.15571/) (2022)
- [Consistency Trajectory Models: Learning Probability Flow ODE Trajectory of Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02279/) (2023)
- [Implicit Behavioral Cloning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00137/) (2021)
- [InstaFlow: One Step is Enough for High-Quality Diffusion-Based Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06380/) (2023)
- [Consistency Policy: Accelerated Visuomotor Policies via Consistency Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07503/) (2024)
- [DPM-Solver-v3: Improved Diffusion ODE Solver with Empirical Model Statistics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13268/) (2023)
- [Consistency Flow Matching: Defining Straight Flows with Velocity Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02398/) (2024)
- [FlowPolicy: Enabling Fast and Robust 3D Flow-based Policy via Consistency Flow Matching for Robot Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04987/) (2024)
- [Multistep Consistency Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06807/) (2024)
- [Learning Robotic Manipulation Policies from Point Clouds with Conditional Flow Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07343/) (2024)
- [ManiCM: Real-time 3D Diffusion Policy via Consistency Model for Robotic Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01586/) (2024)
- [AdaFlow: Imitation Learning with Variance-Adaptive Flow-Based Policies](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.04292/) (2024)
- [Flow Matching Imitation Learning for Multi-Support Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.12381/) (2024)
- [3D Flow Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Generating Flow in 3D Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18676/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Flow matching policies learn continuous velocity fields that transport noise to actions, enabling fast deterministic inference for robot manipulation. However, standard training optimizes a pointwise velocity objective while inference requires numerical integration of that field -- a mismatch that causes compounding trajectory errors. We propose four complementary remedies: (1) auxiliary rectified flow velocity regression that provides uniform temporal supervision across the full time interval; (2) multi-step trajectory consistency training that supervises the integrated displacement of the velocity field over trajectory segments, directly closing the train-inference gap; (3) velocity field regularization that enforces temporal smoothness, preventing oscillations that destabilize integration; and (4) fourth-order Runge-Kutta (RK4) inference that reduces global discretization error by orders of magnitude over Euler methods. Critically, these components are not independently sufficient -- RK4 without a smooth velocity field fails, and smoothness without trajectory-level supervision still drifts, as our ablation study confirms. We further pair these with a dual-view 3D point cloud encoder using two independent PointNet encoders for complementary spatial perception. On four real-robot tasks across a Franka arm and a Boston Dynamics Spot, our method achieves 70% and 60% overall success on two long-horizon multi-phase tasks where both baselines score 0%, and reaches 100% on precision tool placement. Three MetaWorld simulation tasks confirm consistent improvements, validating that trajectory-level supervision is essential for reliable policy execution.