# SHRED: Retain-Set-Free Unlearning via Self-Distillation with Logit Demotion

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07482 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07482/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 28 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Machine unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/machine-unlearning/)
- Knowledge distillation / [Knowledge distillation for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/distill/knowledge-distillation-for-llms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02531/) (2015)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07805/) (2020)
- [Editing Models with Task Arithmetic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04089/) (2022)
- [Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03817/) (2019)
- [Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.07646/) (2022)
- [Born Again Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.04770/) (2018)
- [TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06121/) (2024)
- [The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03218/) (2024)
- [Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05868/) (2024)
- [Be Your Own Teacher: Improve the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Self Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.08094/) (2019)
- [Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01504/) (2022)
- [Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02238/) (2023)
- [NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18018/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.02299/) (2022)
- [Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19897/) (2026)
- [Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07163/) (2024)
- [Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16835/) (2024)
- [An Adversarial Perspective on Machine Unlearning for AI Safety](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18025/) (2024)
- [Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.10461/) (2019)
- [Reversing the Forget-Retain Objectives: An Efficient LLM Unlearning Framework from Logit Difference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08607/) (2024)
- [Unlearning or Obfuscating? Jogging the Memory of Unlearned LLMs via Benign Relearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13356/) (2024)
- [OpenUnlearning: Accelerating LLM Unlearning via Unified Benchmarking of Methods and Metrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12618/) (2025)
- [Do Unlearning Methods Remove Information from Language Model Weights?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08827/) (2024)
- [UNDIAL: Self-Distillation with Adjusted Logits for Robust Unlearning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10052/) (2024)
- [RKLD: Reverse KL-Divergence-based Knowledge Distillation for Unlearning Personal Information in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01983/) (2024)
- [Hubble: a Model Suite to Advance the Study of LLM Memorization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19811/) (2025)
- [Is Bigger Edit Batch Size Always Better? -- An Empirical Study on Model Editing with Llama-3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00664/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Machine unlearning for large language models (LLMs) aims to selectively remove memorized content such as private data, copyrighted text, or hazardous knowledge, without costly full retraining. Most existing methods require a retain set of curated examples to prevent catastrophic degradation of general model utility, creating an extra data dependency that complicates deployment. We propose SHRED (Self-distillation via High-surprisal-only Retain-set-free Entropy Demotion), a retain-set-free unlearning method built on a key insight: not all tokens within a forget set instance carry memorized information equally. High-information tokens concentrate the model's memorized knowledge, while low-information tokens reflect general language competence. SHRED operates in two stages. (1) Selection: We perform a forward pass on a forget set instance, collect per-token autoregressive probabilities, and select the bottom (lowest probability, highest Shannon information) as forget positions; the remaining positions are retained as benign anchors. (2) Training: We construct modified KL targets that demote the memorized token's logit at forget positions while preserving the original distribution at benign positions. The model is then trained via a single top KL self-distillation objective that simultaneously drives forgetting and utility preservation. We evaluate SHRED across four standard unlearning benchmarks and demonstrate that it establishes a new Pareto-optimal trade-off between forget efficacy and model utility, outperforming retain-set-dependent methods. Our analysis shows that SHRED is robust against relearning attacks and membership-inference attacks, and it maintains stable utility even after many sequential unlearning runs.