# A Self-Healing Framework for Reliable LLM-Based Autonomous Agents

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06737 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06737/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17651/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.05232/) (2023)
- [HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17580/) (2023)
- [Towards Lifelong Learning of Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06391/) (2024)
- [Recent Advances of Foundation Language Models-based Continual Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.18653/) (2024)
- [ReliabilityBench: Evaluating LLM Agent Reliability Under Production-Like Stress Conditions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.06112/) (2026)
- [Self-Adaptive Large Language Model (LLM)-Based Multiagent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.06187/) (2023)
- [Defining and Detecting the Defects of the Large Language Model-based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18371/) (2024)
- [AgentFixer: From Failure Detection to Fix Recommendations in LLM Agentic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.29848/) (2026)
- [E2E Process Automation Leveraging Generative AI and IDP-Based Automation Agent: A Case Study on Corporate Expense Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20733/) (2025)
- [A Study on the Framework for Evaluating the Ethics and Trustworthiness of Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00398/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Agent Economics: An Entropy-Controlled Pluralistic Alignment Framework for Preventing Artificial Hivemind in Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09039/) (2026)
- [Towards Reliable AI Data Scientists: Data Agents with Workflow Harnesses](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.35255/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous agents based on Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being utilized in complex software systems. However, reliability remains a significant challenge due to unpredictable failures such as hallucinations, execution errors, and inconsistent reasoning. This paper proposes a reliability-aware self-healing framework for LLM-based software agents. The framework integrates failure detection, reliability assessment, and automated recovery mechanisms. First, we define a taxonomy of failure types and introduce a quantitative reliability assessment model. Next, we propose a failure detection method that identifies abnormal agent behavior based on execution patterns and output consistency. Finally, we design a self-healing mechanism that dynamically recovers from failures through adaptive replanning and corrective prompting strategies. The proposed framework was implemented in a multi-agent workflow environment and evaluated using real-world task scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly increases task success rates, reduces failure propagation, and enhances overall system robustness compared to existing methods. In particular, this study distinguishes itself by establishing an integrated monitoring system that combines the agent's internal reasoning process with external execution results. These findings are expected to contribute to securing the stability of advanced autonomous systems and lowering the barriers to LLM adoption in production environments.