# Sequential Design of Genetic Circuits Under Uncertainty With Reinforcement Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06552 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.06552/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods.
- Builds on 7 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

## Placed in

- Deep reinforcement learning methods / [RL for energy, networks and operations](https://mlsanity.com/deeprl/rl-for-energy-networks-and-operations/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01703/) (2019)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.02438/) (2015)
- [Implicit Deep Adaptive Design: Policy-Based Experimental Design without Likelihoods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02329/) (2021)
- [Step-DAD: Semi-Amortized Policy-Based Bayesian Experimental Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14057/) (2025)
- [The Koopman Expectation: An Operator Theoretic Method for Efficient Analysis and Optimization of Uncertain Hybrid Dynamical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.08737/) (2020)
- [GenAI-Net: A Generative AI Framework for Automated Biomolecular Network Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.17582/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The design of biological systems is hindered by uncertainty arising from both intrinsic stochasticity of biomolecular reactions and variability across laboratory or experimental conditions. In this work, we present a sequential framework to optimize genetic circuits under both forms of uncertainty. By employing simulator models based on differential equations or Markov jump processes alongside a reinforcement learning (RL) policy-based approach, our method suggests experiments that adapt to unknown laboratory conditions while accounting for inherent stochasticity. While previous Bayesian methods address uncertainty through iterative experiment-inference-optimization cycles, they typically require computationally expensive inference and optimization steps after each experimental round, leading to delays. To overcome this bottleneck, we propose an amortized approach trained up-front across a distribution of possible uncertain parameters. This strategy sidesteps the need for explicit parameter inference during the design cycle, enabling immediate, observation-based adaptation. We demonstrate our framework on models for heterologous gene expression and a repressilator circuit, showing that it efficiently handles both molecular noise and cross-laboratory variability.
