# TableVista: Benchmarking Multimodal Table Reasoning under Visual and Structural Complexity

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05955 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05955/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00122/) (2021)
- [Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.00305/) (2015)
- [TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02164/) (2019)
- [MiniCPM-V 4.5: Cooking Efficient MLLMs via Architecture, Data, and Training Recipe](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.18154/) (2025)
- [FeTaQA: Free-form Table Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.00369/) (2021)
- [Molmo2: Open Weights and Data for Vision-Language Models with Video Understanding and Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.10611/) (2026)
- [TableLlama: Towards Open Large Generalist Models for Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09206/) (2023)
- [HiTab: A Hierarchical Table Dataset for Question Answering and Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06712/) (2021)
- [TabPedia: Towards Comprehensive Visual Table Understanding with Concept Synergy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01326/) (2024)
- [TableVQA-Bench: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark on Multiple Table Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.19205/) (2024)
- [DocMath-Eval: Evaluating Math Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs in Understanding Long and Specialized Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09805/) (2023)
- [RobuT: A Systematic Study of Table QA Robustness Against Human-Annotated Adversarial Perturbations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14321/) (2023)
- [Tables as Texts or Images: Evaluating the Table Reasoning Ability of LLMs and MLLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.12424/) (2024)
- [Table-R1: Inference-Time Scaling for Table Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23621/) (2025)
- [Does Table Source Matter? Benchmarking and Improving Multimodal Scientific Table Understanding and Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13042/) (2025)
- [Multimodal Tabular Reasoning with Privileged Structured Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04088/) (2025)
- [Knowledge-Aware Reasoning over Multimodal Semi-structured Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13860/) (2024)
- [NeedleInATable: Exploring Long-Context Capability of Large Language Models towards Long-Structured Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.06560/) (2025)
- [TableMoE: Neuro-Symbolic Routing for Structured Expert Reasoning in Multimodal Table Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.21393/) (2025)
- [Texts or Images? A Fine-grained Analysis on the Effectiveness of Input Representations and Models for Table Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14131/) (2025)
- [TABLET: A Large-Scale Dataset for Robust Visual Table Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21205/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [MERIT: Multimodal Evidence Reasoning over Image Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.17937/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce TableVista, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating foundation models in multimodal table reasoning under visual and structural complexity. TableVista consists of 3,000 high-quality table reasoning problems, where each instance is expanded into 10 distinct visual variants through our multi-style rendering and transformation pipeline. This process encompasses diverse scenario styles, robustness perturbations, and vision-only configurations, culminating in 30,000 multimodal samples for a multi-dimensional evaluation. We conduct an extensive evaluation of 29 state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary foundation models on TableVista. Through comprehensive quantitative and qualitative analysis, we find that while evaluated models remain largely stable across diverse rendering styles, they exhibit pronounced performance degradation on complex structural layouts and vision-only settings, revealing that current models struggle to maintain reasoning consistency when structural complexity combines with visually integrated presentations. These findings highlight critical gaps in current multimodal capabilities, providing insights for advancing more robust and reliable table understanding models.