# iTRIALSPACE: Programmable Virtual Lesion Trials for Controlled Evaluation of Lung CT Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05761 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05761/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Day](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00890/) (2023)
- [BiomedCLIP: a multimodal biomedical foundation model pretrained from fifteen million scientific image-text pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.00915/) (2023)
- [Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: the LUNA16 challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.08012/) (2016)
- [LNDb: A Lung Nodule Database on Computed Tomography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.08434/) (2019)
- [The Utility of the Virtual Imaging Trials Methodology for Objective Characterization of AI Systems and Training Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09730/) (2023)
- [CT-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Lesion Understanding in Computed Tomography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14879/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [When Does Synthetic CT Transfer? A Label-Free Donor/Host Diagnostic for Medical Vision-Language Model Routing on Real Lung CT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29232/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce iTRIALSPACE, a programmable evaluation framework for controlled assessment of lung CT models. Standard benchmarks are static retrospective collections that entangle lesion size, lobe prevalence, anatomy, and acquisition context, making it difficult to determine what structurally drives model accuracy. iTRIALSPACE addresses this limitation by composing real clinical CTs and lesion profiles into controlled virtual lesion trials through a four-stage pipeline: multidataset nodule profiling, explicit trial specification, anatomy-aware mask insertion, and ControlNet-conditioned CT synthesis. The framework is built on a unified 54-attribute nodule-profile dataset spanning 13,140 annotated nodules from seven public CT sources and instantiated as 13 trial modes. We evaluate iTRIALSPACE in a 55,469-sample Virtual Lesion Study spanning three medical VLMs, four spatialguidance conditions, and three clinical tasks. Across all 13 modes, the synthetic substrate remains within the real-to-real FID baseline, and synthetic performance rankings transfer strongly to real clinical data (ρ = 0.93, p < 10-15). Controlled trial modes expose findings unavailable to fixed-distribution benchmarks, including shortcut-driven size prediction collapse under lobe-equalized sampling and hostto-donor variance ratios of 8.9x and 3.3x in twin-cross analysis. These results position iTRIALSPACE as an auditable evaluation infrastructure for controlled, falsifiable testing beyond static retrospective benchmarks.
