# Energy Generative Modeling: A Lyapunov-based Energy Matching Perspective

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.05530 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.05530/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 10 of its 20 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 7 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.13456/) (2020)
- [Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.03585/) (2015)
- [Flow Matching for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.02747/) (2022)
- [Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distribution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.05600/) (2019)
- [Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.03003/) (2022)
- [Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08797/) (2023)
- [Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00482/) (2023)
- [Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.06408/) (2016)
- [Energy Matching: Unifying Flow Matching and Energy-Based Models for Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10612/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Generative models based on static scalar energy functions represent an emerging paradigm in which a single time independent potential drives sample generation through its gradient field, eliminating the need for time conditioning entirely. We unify the training and sampling phases of this paradigm, conventionally treated as separate procedures, within a single framework: density transport on the Wasserstein space, cast as a nonlinear control problem in which the Kullback Leibler (KL) divergence serves as a Lyapunov function. Training and sampling are then two instances of this same master dynamics, differing only in initial condition. Within this autonomous framework we develop two analytic results. First, since the Lyapunov certificate is asymptotic, we derive a finite step stopping criterion for Langevin sampling and prove that no Lyapunov certificate exists for the deterministic gradient flow on the same energy landscape. Second, the reformulation brings the toolkit of nonlinear control theory to bear on static scalar energy generative modeling, that is, we show that additive composition of trained scalar energies retains an explicit Gibbs invariant measure and inherits the closed-loop Lyapunov certificate. Beyond these immediate results, this reformulation bridges static scalar energy generative models with the full toolkit of nonlinear control theory, opening the door to barrier functions for constrained generation and contraction metrics for accelerated sampling. Experiments on synthetic distributions validate the theoretical predictions.