# Benchmarking LLMs on the Massive Sound Embedding Benchmark (MSEB)

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04556 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.04556/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20215/) (2025)
- [SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.01051/) (2021)
- [FSD50K: An Open Dataset of Human-Labeled Sound Events](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.00475/) (2020)
- [MMAU: A Massive Multi-Task Audio Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19168/) (2024)
- [AudioBench: A Universal Benchmark for Audio Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16020/) (2024)
- [MMAR: A Challenging Benchmark for Deep Reasoning in Speech, Audio, Music, and Their Mix](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13032/) (2025)
- [Dynamic-SUPERB: Towards A Dynamic, Collaborative, and Comprehensive Instruction-Tuning Benchmark for Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.09510/) (2023)
- [Gemini Embedding: Generalizable Embeddings from Gemini](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07891/) (2025)
- [MMAU-Pro: A Challenging and Comprehensive Benchmark for Holistic Evaluation of Audio General Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.13992/) (2025)
- [Speech-MASSIVE: A Multilingual Speech Dataset for SLU and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03900/) (2024)
- [Massive Sound Embedding Benchmark (MSEB)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07143/) (2026)
- [MAEB: Massive Audio Embedding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.16008/) (2026)
- [Evaluating Speech-to-Text x LLM x Text-to-Speech Combinations for AI Interview Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.16835/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The Massive Sound Embedding Benchmark (MSEB) has emerged as a standard for evaluating the functional breadth of audio models. While initial baselines focused on specialized encoders, the shift toward "audio-native" Large Language Models (LLMs) suggests a new paradigm where a single multimodal backbone may replace complex, task-specific pipelines. This paper provides a rigorous empirical evaluation of leading LLMs - including members from the Gemini and GPT families - across the eight core MSEB capabilities to assess their efficacy and audio-text parity. Our results indicate that while a significant modality gap persists regarding performance and robustness, the empirical evidence for an "optimal" modeling approach remains inconclusive. Ultimately, the choice between audionative and cascaded architectures depends heavily on specific use-case requirements and the underlying assumptions regarding latency, cost, and reasoning depth.
