# Deep Wave Network for Modeling Multi-Scale Physical Dynamics

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04198 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.04198/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 69 of its 103 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 69)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.11929/) (2020)
- [Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11239/) (2020)
- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restarts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.03983/) (2016)
- [RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embedding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.09864/) (2021)
- [Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.12092/) (2021)
- [Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09672/) (2021)
- [A ConvNet for the 2020s](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.03545/) (2022)
- [Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.08415/) (2016)
- [Wide Residual Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.07146/) (2016)
- [Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.08895/) (2020)
- [Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.05431/) (2016)
- [Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02357/) (2016)
- [DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.03193/) (2019)
- [Group Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.08494/) (2018)
- [Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.01261/) (2018)
- [Self-Attention with Relative Position Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02155/) (2018)
- [Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.09405/) (2020)
- [Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03409/) (2020)
- [Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10974/) (2021)
- [Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.03794/) (2021)
- [Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01010/) (2021)
- [PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07182/) (2022)
- [Choose a Transformer: Fourier or Galerkin](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14995/) (2021)
- [ClimaX: A foundation model for weather and climate](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.10343/) (2023)
- [GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14376/) (2023)
- [Transformer for Partial Differential Equations' Operator Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.13671/) (2022)
- [ResUNet-a: a deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.00592/) (2019)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Performance of deep learning models is strongly governed by architectural capacity, with width and depth as primary controls. However, in physical-science applications, models are often compared at a single fixed size or by separating accuracy and computational cost, which can be misleading since architectures exhibit different accuracy-cost scaling as width and depth vary. This issue is particularly relevant for U-Net-type encoder-decoder models, widely used for multi-scale gas, fluid, and plasma dynamics due to their ability to represent features across spatial scales. A U-Net constructs a multi-resolution representation via an encoder that progressively reduces spatial resolution, followed by a decoder that restores it for prediction. Skip connections link corresponding encoder and decoder features, preserving fine-scale information and improving optimization. In practice, U-Net width is routinely tuned, while depth is typically kept fixed (a set number of down/up-sampling stages with few convolutions per stage), limiting systematic exploration of depth for improving the accuracy-cost trade-off. We address this limitation by increasing effective depth through stacking multiple encoder-decoder "waves" in series, with skip connections both within and across waves to enable progressive cross-scale refinement. We call this architecture a Deep Wave Network (DW-Net). Training data, optimization, and schedules are kept identical across models. Instead of evaluating single configurations, we train multiple width variants of each architecture and compare accuracy vs. GPU time Pareto fronts. Across several 2D and 3D flow benchmarks, DW-Net models consistently improve the Pareto frontier over single-wave U-Nets, achieving higher accuracy at matched cost or similar accuracy at reduced cost, and reaching low-error regimes with up to 3x less training time under identical training settings.