# Single-Position Intervention Fails: Distributed Output Templates Drive In-Context Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.04061 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.04061/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Circuits and mechanistic analysis, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability.
- Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2026.

## Placed in

- Mechanistic interpretability / [Circuits and mechanistic analysis](https://mlsanity.com/mechinterp/circuits-and-mechanistic-analysis/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.05262/) (2022)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12837/) (2022)
- [Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09690/) (2021)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [Toy Models of Superposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.10652/) (2022)
- [Transformers learn in-context by gradient descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07677/) (2022)
- [Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14997/) (2023)
- [What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01066/) (2022)
- [What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15661/) (2022)
- [Null It Out: Guarding Protected Attributes by Iterative Nullspace Projection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.07667/) (2020)
- [In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15916/) (2023)
- [Function Vectors in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15213/) (2023)
- [Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.08951/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [A Pre-Specified Construction-Confirmation Test of Operation-Level Causal Transfer Across Finite Isomorphic Symbolic Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15809/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding how large language models encode task identity from few-shot demonstrations is a central open problem in mechanistic interpretability. Prior work uses linear probing to localize task representations, reporting high classification accuracy at specific layers. We reveal a striking dissociation: probing accuracy completely fails to predict causal importance. Single-position activation intervention achieves 0% task transfer across all 28 layers of Llama-3.2-3B-despite 100% probing accuracy at those same positions. This null result is itself a key finding, demonstrating that task encoding is fundamentally distributed. Multi-position intervention-replacing activations at all demonstration output tokens simultaneously-achieves up to 96% transfer (N=50, 95% CI: [87%, 99%]) at layer 8, pinpointing for the first time the causal locus of ICL task identity. We establish the generality of these findings across four models spanning three architecture families (LLaMA, Qwen, Gemma), discovering a universal intervention window at ~30% network depth. Causal tracing uncovers an asymmetric architecture: the query position is strictly necessary (53-100% disruption) while no individual demonstration position is necessary (0% disruption)-resolving a key ambiguity in prior accounts. Crucially, transfer depends on internal representation compatibility, not surface similarity (r=-0.05 vs r=0.31), ruling out trivial explanations. These results establish the distributed template hypothesis: ICL task identity is encoded as output format templates distributed across demonstration tokens, fundamentally reshaping our understanding of how in-context learning operates.