# Pixel Perfect: Relational Image Quality Assessment with Spatially-Aware Distortions

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02863 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02863/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03748/) (2018)
- [Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.02611/) (2018)
- [Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01527/) (2021)
- [Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.09883/) (2021)
- [Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1608.05442/) (2016)
- [Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.01697/) (2016)
- [PIPAL: a Large-Scale Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Perceptual Image Restoration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12142/) (2020)
- [No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06858/) (2021)
- [PieAPP: Perceptual Image-Error Assessment through Pairwise Preference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.02067/) (2018)
- [RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.08347/) (2017)
- [dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.06505/) (2019)
- [Data-Efficient Image Quality Assessment with Attention-Panel Decoder](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.04952/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional image quality assessment (IQA) methods rely on mean opinion scores (MOS), which are resource-intensive to collect and fail to provide interpretable, localized feedback on specific image distortions. We overcome these limitations by shifting from absolute quality prediction to a relational and directional assessment. Our approach utilizes a self-supervised synthetic distortion engine to generate training data, eliminating the need for manual annotation. A distortion prediction network is trained with an anti-symmetric objective to produce spatially-aware, disentangled maps that identify the type, intensity, and direction of distortions relative to a reference image. Subsequently, a scoring network is trained via contrastive learning on ordinally ranked image sets to predict a relational quality score. Our method provides a more granular and interpretable approach to IQA for the targeted optimization of image processing algorithms without requiring any human-labeled quality scores.
