# Does it Really Count? Assessing Semantic Grounding in Text-Guided Class-Agnostic Counting

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02752 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02752/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 32 of its 57 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.05499/) (2023)
- [Composition Loss for Counting, Density Map Estimation and Localization in Dense Crowds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.01050/) (2018)
- [Context-Aware Crowd Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.10452/) (2018)
- [Learning To Count Everything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08391/) (2021)
- [CLIP-Count: Towards Text-Guided Zero-Shot Object Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07304/) (2023)
- [CounTR: Transformer-based Generalised Visual Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.13721/) (2022)
- [A Low-Shot Object Counting Network With Iterative Prototype Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.08217/) (2022)
- [CountGD: Multi-Modal Open-World Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.04619/) (2024)
- [Zero-shot Object Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02001/) (2023)
- [DAVE -- A Detect-and-Verify Paradigm for Low-Shot Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16622/) (2024)
- [VLCounter: Text-aware Visual Representation for Zero-Shot Object Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.16580/) (2023)
- [Learning to Count Anything: Reference-less Class-agnostic Counting with Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10203/) (2022)
- [Open-world Text-specified Object Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01851/) (2023)
- [Point, Segment and Count: A Generalized Framework for Object Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12386/) (2023)
- [Training-free Object Counting with Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00038/) (2023)
- [Count-ception: Counting by Fully Convolutional Redundant Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.08710/) (2017)
- [FCN-rLSTM: Deep Spatio-Temporal Neural Networks for Vehicle Counting in City Cameras](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.09476/) (2017)
- [Vision Transformer Off-the-Shelf: A Surprising Baseline for Few-Shot Class-Agnostic Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04440/) (2023)
- [Crowd Counting Using Scale-Aware Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.02025/) (2019)
- [Revisiting Crowd Counting: State-of-the-art, Trends, and Future Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.07271/) (2022)
- [OmniCount: Multi-label Object Counting with Semantic-Geometric Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05435/) (2024)
- [ABC Easy as 123: A Blind Counter for Exemplar-Free Multi-Class Class-agnostic Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.04820/) (2023)
- [AFreeCA: Annotation-Free Counting for All](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.04943/) (2024)
- [Mind the Prompt: A Novel Benchmark for Prompt-based Class-Agnostic Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15953/) (2024)
- [A Fixed-Point Approach to Unified Prompt-Based Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.10236/) (2024)
- [Multi-Camera Vehicle Counting Using Edge-AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.02842/) (2021)
- [A Survey on Class-Agnostic Counting: Advancements from Reference-Based to Open-World Text-Guided Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19184/) (2025)
- [Semantic Generative Augmentations for Few-Shot Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16122/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Object Counting Across Modalities: Taxonomies, Benchmarks, Applications, and Open Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23845/) (2026)
- [UniCounting: Instance-Aware Proposal Consolidation for Image-Query-Free Multi-Category Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.08379/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Open-world text-guided class-agnostic counting (CAC) has emerged as a flexible paradigm for counting arbitrary object classes by using natural language prompts. However, current evaluation protocols primarily focus on standard counting errors within single-category images, overlooking a fundamental requirement: the ability to correctly ground the textual prompt in the visual scene. In this paper, we show that several state-of-the-art CAC models often struggle to determine which object class should be counted based on the given prompt, revealing a misalignment between textual semantics and visual object representations. This limitation leads to spurious counting responses and reduced reliability in real-world scenarios. To systematically address these limitations, we propose a new evaluation framework focused on model robustness and trustworthiness. Our contribution is two-fold: (i) we introduce PrACo++ (Prompt-Aware Counting++), a novel test suite featuring two dedicated evaluation protocols -- the negative-label test and the distractor test -- paired with new specialized metrics; and (ii) we present the MUCCA (MUlti-Category Class-Agnostic counting) evaluation dataset, a new collection of real-world images featuring multiple annotated object categories per scene, unlike existing CAC benchmarks that typically include a single category per image. Our extensive experimental evaluation of 10 state-of-the-art methods shows that, despite strong performance under standard counting metrics, current models exhibit significant weaknesses in understanding and grounding object class descriptions. Finally, we provide a quantitative analysis of how semantic similarity between prompts influences these failures. Overall, our results underscore the need for more semantically grounded architectures and offer a reliable framework for future assessment in open-world text-guided CAC methods.
