# Executor-Side Progressive Risk-Gated Actuation for Agentic AI in Wireless Supervisory Control

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02697 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02697/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Agentic AI for wireless networks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Agentic AI for wireless networks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/agentic-ai-for-wireless-networks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03629/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.11432/) (2023)
- [AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.08155/) (2023)
- [Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08611/) (2017)
- [Semantic Communications for Future Internet: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00427/) (2022)
- [Semantic Communications: Principles and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.01389/) (2021)
- [TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04133/) (2025)
- [AgentRAN: An Agentic AI Architecture for Autonomous Control of Open 6G Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.17778/) (2025)
- [ComAgent: Multi-LLM based Agentic AI Empowered Intelligent Wireless Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19607/) (2026)
- [Conflict Mitigation Framework and Conflict Detection in O-RAN Near-RT RIC](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07117/) (2023)
- [Intent-driven autonomous network and service management in future cellular networks: A structured literature review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.04560/) (2021)
- [Dynamic Simplex: Balancing Safety and Performance in Autonomous Cyber Physical Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.09750/) (2023)
- [Multi-Agentic AI for Conflict-Aware rApp Policy Orchestration in Open RAN](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.07375/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise for automating O-RAN wireless supervisory control, but translated intents still require an executor-side decision before live network actuation. Existing control flows lack explicit semantics for whether an intent should commit, gate for evidence, or reject under stale telemetry, concurrent policies, deadline and bandwidth limits, and rollback constraints. We propose Progressive Risk-Gated Actuation (PRGA), an executor-side contract for risk-gated wireless intent execution. PRGA structures each intent into executable local triage (C0), on-demand coordination evidence (C1), and post-hoc provenance support (C2), with C2 kept off the online safety path. A deterministic two-stage policy checks expiry, freshness, rollback-handle validity, local conflict, blocking preconditions, and planner-executor risk divergence from C0, then retrieves C1 only for gated intents when deadline and bandwidth budgets allow; evidence-mandatory gates reject when required C1 is unavailable. On two 3GPP-parameterized energy-saving and slice-SLA benchmarks, PRGA reduces time-to-first-safe-action by 23.3-27.4% and per-commit control-plane bytes by 52.7-54.2% against a decision-identical eager full-evidence cost-overlay comparator, thereby isolating retrieval-cost accounting; remains non-inferior within a pre-declared 0.5 percentage-point unsafe-action margin against an invariant-respecting static-threshold comparator; and rejects 100% of injected over-threshold stale inputs in the stale-state fault campaign. On these benchmarks, PRGA improves supervisory responsiveness and control-plane efficiency within the evaluated unsafe-action boundary.