# VIDA: A Dataset for Visually Dependent Ambiguity in Multimodal Machine Translation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02035 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02035/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 34 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [s1: Simple test-time scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.19393/) (2025)
- [COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.09025/) (2020)
- [Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Instruction Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.18715/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucination via Concentric Causal Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.15926/) (2024)
- [Good for Misconceived Reasons: An Empirical Revisiting on the Need for Visual Context in Multimodal Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.14462/) (2021)
- [Qwen Look Again: Guiding Vision-Language Reasoning Models to Re-attention Visual Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23558/) (2025)
- [Tackling Ambiguity with Images: Improved Multimodal Machine Translation and Contrastive Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10140/) (2022)
- [Vision Matters When It Should: Sanity Checking Multimodal Machine Translation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.03415/) (2021)
- [LVP-M3: Language-aware Visual Prompt for Multilingual Multimodal Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.15461/) (2022)
- [3AM: An Ambiguity-Aware Multi-Modal Machine Translation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18413/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [IndustryBench-MIPU: Benchmarking Multi-Image Attribute Value Extraction for Industrial Products](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.14383/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Ambiguity resolution is a key challenge in multimodal machine translation (MMT), where models must genuinely leverage visual input to map an ambiguous expression to its intended meaning. Although prior work has proposed disambiguation-oriented benchmarks probing the role of vision, we observe that existing benchmarks remain limited by task-format mismatch, narrow ambiguity coverage, or insufficient visual-dependency validation. Moreover, existing ambiguity evaluations are not well suited to diverse ambiguity types in open-ended translation. To address these limitations, we present VIDA (Visually-Dependent Ambiguity), a dataset of 2,500 carefully curated instances in which resolving an annotated source span requires visual evidence. We further propose Disambiguation-Centric Metrics that use an LLM-as-a-judge classifier to verify whether annotated ambiguous expressions are resolved correctly at the span level. Evaluations with stronger recent LVLMs show that visual disambiguation remains challenging. Using chain-of-thought supervised fine-tuning as a diagnostic setting, we observe stronger out-of-distribution disambiguation than with SFT, with robust gains on collective-noun ambiguities and model-dependent gains on sentence-level ambiguities.