# How Can One Choose the Best CAM-Based Explainability Method for a CNN Model?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02007 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02007/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- [Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.04150/) (2015)
- [Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11063/) (2017)
- [Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01279/) (2019)
- [Axiom-based Grad-CAM: Towards Accurate Visualization and Explanation of CNNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.02312/) (2020)
- [Explainable Deep Learning: A Field Guide for the Uninitiated](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14545/) (2020)
- [Smooth Grad-CAM++: An Enhanced Inference Level Visualization Technique for Deep Convolutional Neural Network Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.01224/) (2019)
- [XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.02825/) (2019)
- [HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03184/) (2021)
- [What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.04417/) (2021)
- [SS-CAM: Smoothed Score-CAM for Sharper Visual Feature Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14255/) (2020)
- [IS-CAM: Integrated Score-CAM for axiomatic-based explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03023/) (2020)
- [To what extent do human explanations of model behavior align with actual model behavior?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13354/) (2020)
- [Dissonance Between Human and Machine Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.07337/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, several advances have been observed in Deep Learning with surprising results. Models in this area have been increasingly used in numerous applications, including those sensitive to human life, which require clear explanations and justifications. Various explainability methods have been proposed, but not many metrics to evaluate these methods. The most commonly used metric is the Intersection over Union (IoU). However, due to the characteristics of the results of the explainability methods, called saliency maps, which do not have a known shape, we hypothesise that there must be a better metric that allows one to find an explainability method that produces results that best resemble the human perception. We propose using different metrics to assess the similarity between human perception and the explanation saliency maps to find a better metric. An investigation was conducted employing a subset of the Chihuahuas images from ImageNet dataset. Several CAM-based explainability methods were used to generate saliency maps for each chihuahua image. Alignment was measured by applying distance metrics between the bounding box of human annotations and the saliency maps produced by each explainability method. Rankings of the best saliency maps were created using the results of the distance metrics and compared to the ranking obtained using people's choice, collected through crowdsourcing, of the best explanation saliency maps for each selected image. Comparison between rankings was performed using the Rank-Biased Overlap (RBO) metric. The results indicate the feasibility of our method to find the explainability method that best resembles human perception. In our experiments, the two metrics that best resemble human perception corresponded to Manhattan and Correlation. Besides, the best explainability methods regarding human perception were LayerCAM, Score-CAM, and IS-CAM.