# StressEval: Failure-Driven Dynamic Benchmarking for Knowledge-Intensive Reasoning in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01939 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.01939/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 24 of its 48 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.09600/) (2018)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.02556/) (2025)
- [Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.00305/) (2015)
- [The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06643/) (2018)
- [LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19314/) (2024)
- [WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04770/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19736/) (2023)
- [Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.09932/) (2024)
- [Investigating Data Contamination in Modern Benchmarks for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09783/) (2023)
- [Auto-Arena: Automating LLM Evaluations with Agent Peer Battles and Committee Discussions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20267/) (2024)
- [Outlining and Filling: Hierarchical Query Graph Generation for Answering Complex Questions over Knowledge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.00732/) (2021)
- [Forewarned is Forearmed: Leveraging LLMs for Data Synthesis through Failure-Inducing Exploration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16736/) (2024)
- [OneEval: Benchmarking LLM Knowledge-intensive Reasoning over Diverse Knowledge Bases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12577/) (2025)
- [K-DeCore: Facilitating Knowledge Transfer in Continual Structured Knowledge Reasoning via Knowledge Decoupling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16929/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Self-Evolving Agent Harness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.18813/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Static benchmarks for LLMs are increasingly compromised by contamination and overfitting especially on knowledge intensive reasoning tasks While recent dynamic benchmarks can alleviate staleness they often increase difficulty at the expense of answerability and controllability In this paper we propose StressEval a failure driven data synthesis framework that turns observed model failures into dynamic challenging and controllable test instances StressEval consists of three stages first it constructs a semi structured difficulty card that identifies the failed reasoning step and its root cause second it applies a dual perspective instance synthesis method that targets both knowledge gaps and reasoning breakdowns while preserving the underlying difficulty factors and third it applies a gating mechanism to retain only grounded unambiguous instances Seeding from multiple knowledge intensive reasoning datasets we employ StressEval to build Dynamic OneEval a focused suite of challenging dynamic benchmark Across several state of the art LLMs Dynamic OneEval yields substantially larger performance drops than the original benchmarks while retaining explicit difficulty factors enabling more actionable iteration