# Spatiotemporal Hidden-State Dynamics as a Signature of Internal Reasoning in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01853 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.01853/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 22 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 May 2026.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning benchmarks and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-benchmarks-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Qwen3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.09388/) (2025)
- [gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.10925/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12122/) (2024)
- [Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13063/) (2023)
- [Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Words](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.14334/) (2022)
- [Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.01219/) (2023)
- [TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05561/) (2024)
- [When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.07266/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05419/) (2025)
- [Confidence Is All You Need: Few-Shot RL Fine-Tuning of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06395/) (2025)
- [CoT-Kinetics: A Theoretical Modeling Assessing LRM Reasoning Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.13408/) (2025)
- [Overclocking LLM Reasoning: Monitoring and Controlling Thinking Path Lengths in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07240/) (2025)
- [Think Deep, Not Just Long: Measuring LLM Reasoning Effort via Deep-Thinking Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13517/) (2026)
- [Knowledge or Reasoning? A Close Look at How LLMs Think Across Domains](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02126/) (2025)
- [Can LLMs Predict Their Own Failures? Self-Awareness via Internal Circuits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20578/) (2025)
- [CLUE: Non-parametric Verification from Experience via Hidden-State Clustering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01591/) (2025)
- [Hidden States as Early Signals: Step-level Trace Evaluation and Pruning for Efficient Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09093/) (2026)
- [Tracing the Traces: Latent Temporal Signals for Efficient and Accurate Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.10494/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large reasoning models (LRMs) generate extended solutions, yet it remains unclear whether these traces reflect substantive internal computation or merely verbosity and overthinking. Although recent hidden-state analyses suggest that internal representations carry correctness-related signals, their coarse aggregations may obscure the token and layer structure underlying reasoning computation. We investigate hidden-state transitions across decoding steps and layers, and identify a distinct spatiotemporal pattern in LRMs: successful trajectories exhibit broad temporal dynamics with localized layer-wise concentration, while this structure is weaker in non-reasoning models and knowledge-heavy domains. We formalize this characteristic as Spatiotemporal Amplitude of Latent Transition (StALT), a training-free trajectory statistic that summarizes temporal changes between adjacent tokens weighted by within-token layer saliency. Across diverse models and benchmarks, StALT reliably separates correct from incorrect trajectories in reasoning-intensive regimes, providing a competitive label-free correctness signal alongside strong output-space and length-based baselines. Intervention analyses further show that this spatiotemporal amplitude responds systematically to manipulations that increase or reduce the demand for internal reasoning, supporting its association with latent reasoning dynamics in LRMs. These findings provide empirical evidence that LRMs exhibit measurable hidden-state dynamics and offer a practical probe for understanding internal computation beyond output-based evaluation.