# Interpretable Difficulty-Aware Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01097 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.01097/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.07676/) (2020)
- [Deep Knowledge Tracing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.05908/) (2015)
- [Context-Aware Attentive Knowledge Tracing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12324/) (2020)
- [Dynamic Key-Value Memory Networks for Knowledge Tracing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.08108/) (2016)
- [MathDial: A Dialogue Tutoring Dataset with Rich Pedagogical Properties Grounded in Math Reasoning Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14536/) (2023)
- [Towards an Appropriate Query, Key, and Value Computation for Knowledge Tracing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07033/) (2020)
- [pyKT: A Python Library to Benchmark Deep Learning based Knowledge Tracing Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.11460/) (2022)
- [MathTutorBench: A Benchmark for Measuring Open-ended Pedagogical Capabilities of LLM Tutors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18940/) (2025)
- [simpleKT: A Simple But Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Tracing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06881/) (2023)
- [Exploring Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues using LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16490/) (2024)
- [Training LLM-based Tutors to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06424/) (2025)
- [Teach AI How to Code: Using Large Language Models as Teachable Agents for Programming Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.14534/) (2023)
- [Improving Interpretability of Deep Sequential Knowledge Tracing Models with Question-centric Cognitive Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06885/) (2023)
- [Ruffle&Riley: Insights from Designing and Evaluating a Large Language Model-Based Conversational Tutoring System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.17460/) (2024)
- [SMART: Simulated Students Aligned with Item Response Theory for Question Difficulty Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05129/) (2025)
- [Training Turn-by-Turn Verifiers for Dialogue Tutoring Agents: The Curious Case of LLMs as Your Coding Tutors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13311/) (2025)
- [Towards Robust Knowledge Tracing Models via k-Sparse Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.17097/) (2024)
- [Simulated Students in Tutoring Dialogues: Substance or Illusion?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.04025/) (2026)
- [PIIvot: A Lightweight NLP Anonymization Framework for Question-Anchored Tutoring Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16931/) (2025)
- [Difficulty-Focused Contrastive Learning for Knowledge Tracing with a Large Language Model-Based Difficulty Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11890/) (2023)
- [Which Type of Students can LLMs Act? Investigating Authentic Simulation with Graph-based Human-AI Collaborative System](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11678/) (2025)
- [Letting Tutor Personas Speak Up for LLMs: Learning Steering Vectors from Dialogue via Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.07639/) (2026)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Do LLM Tutors Actually Teach? A Process-Centered Synthesis of the Tutoring Loop](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.15692/) (2026)
- [A Unified Response Framework for Questions and Tutoring Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19532/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have led to the development of AI-powered tutoring systems that provide interactive support via dialogue. To enable these tutoring systems to provide personalized support, it is essential to assess student performance at each turn, motivating knowledge tracing (KT) in dialogue settings. However, existing dialogue-based KT approaches often ignore question difficulty modeling and rely on opaque latent representations from LLMs, hindering accurate and interpretable prediction. In this work, we propose an interpretable difficulty-aware conversational KT framework built upon LLMs, which explicitly models students' abilities and the difficulty of tutor-posed tasks at each turn. The framework incorporates the original textual question and the next tutor-posed task to estimate the student's knowledge state and the difficulty of the upcoming turn. Furthermore, it integrates Item Response Theory to map LLM's outputs into student ability and question difficulty parameters, enabling interpretable prediction of student performance grounded in cognitive theories of learning. We evaluate the framework on two tutor-student dialogue datasets. Both quantitative and qualitative results show that our framework outperforms existing KT baselines, meanwhile generating interpretable outputs consistent with cognitive theory.