# GEODE: Angle-Adaptive OOD Detection with Universal Scorer Compatibility

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.01063 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.01063/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.09412/) (2017)
- [A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02136/) (2016)
- [A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.03888/) (2018)
- [Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02690/) (2017)
- [Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03759/) (2020)
- [Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04606/) (2018)
- [Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.08186/) (2020)
- [Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighbors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06507/) (2022)
- [ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.12797/) (2021)
- [VOS: Learning What You Don't Know by Virtual Outlier Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01197/) (2022)
- [Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.09310/) (2022)
- [Extremely Simple Activation Shaping for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.09858/) (2022)
- [OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09301/) (2023)
- [In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00826/) (2023)
- [Non-Parametric Outlier Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.02966/) (2023)
- [How to Exploit Hyperspherical Embeddings for Out-of-Distribution Detection?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04450/) (2022)
- [Scaling for Training Time and Post-hoc Out-of-distribution Detection Enhancement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00227/) (2023)
- [Mixture Outlier Exposure: Towards Out-of-Distribution Detection in Fine-grained Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.03917/) (2021)
- [NECO: NEural Collapse Based Out-of-distribution detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06823/) (2023)
- [Dissecting Out-of-Distribution Detection and Open-Set Recognition: A Critical Analysis of Methods and Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.16757/) (2024)
- [Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.17816/) (2024)
- [BootOOD: Self-Supervised Out-of-Distribution Detection via Synthetic Sample Exposure under Neural Collapse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.13539/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Outlier Exposure (OE) is among the strongest training-based OOD detectors on standard benchmarks but exhibits scorer-dependent tradeoffs (e.g., strong on MSP, weak on KNN) and requires curated auxiliary data. We show why OE works: its features sit at the same geometric locus as real near-OOD data, with the boundary-adjacent quartile driving nearly all of OE's gain. OE is boundary calibration, not OOD coverage. GEODE (GEOmetry-preserving DEtection) replicates this calibration synthetically through an angle-adaptive norm loss in which targets scale per-sample with cosine similarity to the nearest class mean, preserving feature geometry where boundary structure matters. Four theorems grounded in neural collapse justify the design. GEODE works across all seven standard scorers on CIFAR-10 (near-OOD AUROC 89.0-92.3, far-OOD reaching 93.05; no catastrophic failure on any scorer). Since the OOD regime is unknown at deployment, this is the test that matters. GEODE outperforms vanilla CE at matched epoch counts. Combined with OE, GEODE reaches 95.0 MSP / 94.8 KNN on CIFAR-10 and beats OE on every scorer on CIFAR-100. The gains hold on WRN-28-10 (+4.5 Energy, 3 seeds). Unlike methods that push OOD into the classifier null space (e.g., PFS, 14.38 KNN AUROC, worse than random), GEODE's adaptive target preserves the geometry that distance-based scorers depend on.