# Object-Level Explanations for Image Geolocation Models: a GeoGuessr use-case

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00912 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00912/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 13 of its 17 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03825/) (2017)
- [Concept Bottleneck Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04612/) (2020)
- [Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.11063/) (2017)
- [RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07421/) (2018)
- [Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01279/) (2019)
- [PlaNet - Photo Geolocation with Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05314/) (2016)
- [Revisiting IM2GPS in the Deep Learning Era](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.04838/) (2017)
- [PIGEON: Predicting Image Geolocations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05845/) (2023)
- [OpenStreetView-5M: The Many Roads to Global Visual Geolocation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.18873/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

When humans play geolocation games such as GeoGuessr, they rely on concrete visual cues, such as road markings, vegetation, or architectural details, to infer where an image was captured. Whether image geolocation models rely on similar object-level evidence remains difficult to determine, as attribution methods like Grad-CAM typically highlight diffuse regions rather than coherent visual entities, making it difficult to link model predictions to specific objects or perceptible patterns. In this work, we propose an object-centric analysis pipeline to investigate the visual evidence used by geolocation models. Starting from attribution maps, we extract salient regions and segment them into object-like elements. We evaluate their predictive relevance through deletion and insertion tests, comparing attributionguided crops to randomly selected regions with similar coverage. Experiments on a three-country benchmark show that attribution-guided crops consistently retain more information for the model's prediction than random crops. These results suggest that attribution maps can be decomposed into interpretable, perceptible elements, providing a step toward object-level analysis of geolocation models.