# ControBench: An Interaction-Aware Benchmark for Controversial Discourse Analysis on Social Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.00513 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00513/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 1 May 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10084/) (2019)
- [Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.02216/) (2017)
- [SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08821/) (2021)
- [Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.06103/) (2017)
- [Heterogeneous Graph Attention Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.07293/) (2019)
- [Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.07606/) (2022)
- [Learning on Large-scale Text-attributed Graphs via Variational Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.14709/) (2022)
- [Characterizing Graph Datasets for Node Classification: Homophily-Heterophily Dichotomy and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06177/) (2022)
- [Stance Detection with Collaborative Role-Infused LLM-Based Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10467/) (2023)
- [Twitch Gamers: a Dataset for Evaluating Proximity Preserving and Structural Role-based Node Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.03091/) (2021)
- [The Heterophilic Graph Learning Handbook: Benchmarks, Models, Theoretical Analysis, Applications and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.09618/) (2024)
- [DTGB: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Dynamic Text-Attributed Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12072/) (2024)
- [A Challenge Dataset and Effective Models for Conversational Stance Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.11145/) (2024)
- [The Power of LLM-Generated Synthetic Data for Stance Detection in Online Political Discussions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12480/) (2024)
- [Zero-Shot Conversational Stance Detection: Dataset and Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.17693/) (2025)
- [Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for Heterophilic Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.14134/) (2024)
- [TEG-DB: A Comprehensive Dataset and Benchmark of Textual-Edge Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10310/) (2024)
- [When Heterophily Meets Heterogeneity: Challenges and a New Large-Scale Graph Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.10916/) (2024)
- [HeTGB: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Heterophilic Text-Attributed Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04822/) (2025)
- [FanChuan: A Multilingual and Graph-Structured Benchmark For Parody Detection and Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.16503/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding how people argue across ideological divides online is important for studying political polarization, misinformation, and content moderation. Existing datasets capture only part of this problem: some preserve text but ignore interaction structure, some model structure without rich semantics, and others represent conversations without stable user-level ideological identity. We introduce ControBench, a benchmark for controversial discourse analysis that combines heterogeneous social interaction graphs with rich textual semantics. Built from Reddit discussions on three topics, Trump, abortion, and religion, ControBench contains 7,370 users, 1,783 posts, and 26,525 interactions. The graph contains user and post nodes connected by semantically enriched edges; in particular, user-comment-user edges encode both a reply and the parent comment that it responds to, preserving local argumentative context. User labels are derived from self-declared Reddit flairs, providing a scalable proxy for ideological identity without manual annotation. The resulting datasets exhibit low or negative adjusted homophily (Trump: -0.77, Abortion: 0.06, Religion: 0.04), reflecting the cross-cutting structure of real-world debate. We evaluate graph neural networks, pretrained language models, and large language models on ControBench and observe distinct performance patterns across topics and model families, especially when ideological boundaries are ambiguous. These results position ControBench as a challenging and realistic benchmark for controversial discourse analysis.
