# Evaluating TabPFN for Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Conversion in Data Limited Settings

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27195 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.27195/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 5 of its 16 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Second](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.01848/) (2022)
- [Metrics for Multi-Class Classification: an Overview](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.05756/) (2020)
- [TADPOLE Challenge: Accurate Alzheimer's disease prediction through crowdsourced forecasting of future data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.09016/) (2020)
- [Navigating Data Scarcity using Foundation Models: A Benchmark of Few-Shot and Zero-Shot Learning Approaches in Medical Imaging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.08058/) (2024)
- [Multimodal Deep Learning for Phyllodes Tumor Classification from Ultrasound and Clinical Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00213/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Do Existing Preconditioners Improve Biomedical Tabular Foundation Learning? An Empirical Study on TabPFN Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25013/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate prediction of conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimers Diseases (AD) is essential for early intervention, however, developing reliable conversion predictive models is difficult to develop due to limited longitudinal data availability We evaluate TabPFN (Tabular Pre-Trained Foundation Network) against traditional machine learning methods for predicting 3 year MCI to AD conversion using the TADPOLE dataset derived from ADNI. Using multimodal biomarker features extracted from demographics, APOE4, MRI volumes, CSF markers, and PET imaging, we conducted an experimental comparison across varying training set sizes (N=50 to 1000) and models including XGBoost, Random Forest, LightGBM, and Logistic Regression. TabPFN achieved one the highest performance (AUC=0.892), outperforming LightGBM (AUC=0.860) and demonstrating advantages in low data settings. At N=50 training samples, TabPFN maintained strong AUC while the traditional machine learning models struggles at small training samples. These findings demonstrate that foundation models are promising for disease prediction in data limited scenarios, such as Alzheimers diseases.
