# NORACL: Neurogenesis for Oracle-free Resource-Adaptive Continual Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.27031 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.27031/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00796/) (2016)
- [Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.01852/) (2015)
- [Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.08840/) (2017)
- [Progressive Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1606.04671/) (2016)
- [Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forget](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.09601/) (2017)
- [PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.05769/) (2017)
- [Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6120/) (2013)
- [An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1312.6211/) (2013)
- [Lifelong Learning with Dynamically Expandable Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.01547/) (2017)
- [Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.01423/) (2018)
- [Three scenarios for continual learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.07734/) (2019)
- [Progress & Compress: A scalable framework for continual learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.06370/) (2018)
- [PathNet: Evolution Channels Gradient Descent in Super Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.08734/) (2017)
- [Learn to Grow: A Continual Structure Learning Framework for Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.00310/) (2019)
- [Supermasks in Superposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.14769/) (2020)
- [Compacting, Picking and Growing for Unforgetting Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.06562/) (2019)
- [Reinforced Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.12369/) (2018)
- [Understanding the Role of Training Regimes in Continual Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06958/) (2020)
- [Understanding plasticity in neural networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.01486/) (2023)
- [Efficient Continual Learning with Modular Networks and Task-Driven Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12631/) (2020)
- [Wide Neural Networks Forget Less Catastrophically](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11526/) (2021)
- [When, where, and how to add new neurons to ANNs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.08539/) (2022)
- [Self-Regulated Neurogenesis for Online Data-Incremental Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14684/) (2024)
- [Continual Learning through Control Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04542/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In a continual learning setting, we require a model to be plastic enough to learn a new task and stable enough to not disturb previously learned capabilities. We argue that this dilemma has an architectural root. A finite network has limited representational and plastic resources, yet the required capacity depends on properties of the future task stream that are unknown: how many tasks will be encountered, and how much they overlap in feature space. Regularization-based methods preserve past knowledge within fixed-capacity architectures and therefore implicitly rely on an oracle architecture sized for this unknown future. When tasks are only weakly related, fixed architectures progressively run out of plastic resources; when tasks are few or strongly overlapping, models are often over-provisioned. Inspired by neurogenesis in biology, we propose NORACL to address the stability-plasticity dilemma by tackling the oracle architecture problem through neuronal growth. Starting from a compact network, NORACL grows only when needed by monitoring two complementary signals for representational and plasticity saturation. We evaluate NORACL against oracle-sized static baselines across varying task counts and geometries. Across all settings, NORACL achieves final average accuracies that are better than or on par with oracle-provisioned static baselines while using fewer parameters. Additionally, NORACL yields architectures with interpretable growth, i.e. dissimilar tasks predominantly expand feature-extraction layers, whereas tasks which rely on common features shift growth toward later feature-combination layers. Our analysis further explains why fixed-capacity networks lose plasticity as tasks accumulate, whereas NORACL creates fresh capacity for new tasks through growth. Together, these results show that adaptive neurogenesis pushes the stability-plasticity Pareto frontier of continual learning.