# ClassEval-Pro: A Cross-Domain Benchmark for Class-Level Code Generation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26923 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26923/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 41 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 41)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07974/) (2024)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14196/) (2024)
- [WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12244/) (2023)
- [OpenAI GPT-5 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03267/) (2025)
- [EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.11196/) (2019)
- [StarCoder: may the source be with you!](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06161/) (2023)
- [Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.06709/) (2015)
- [BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15877/) (2024)
- [LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05579/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10620/) (2023)
- [RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12570/) (2023)
- [The Stack: 3 TB of permissively licensed source code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.15533/) (2022)
- [CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03065/) (2024)
- [ClassEval: A Manually-Crafted Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Class-level Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.01861/) (2023)
- [DevEval: A Manually-Annotated Code Generation Benchmark Aligned with Real-World Code Repositories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19856/) (2024)
- [SWE-Exp: Experience-Driven Software Issue Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23361/) (2025)
- [SWE-Debate: Competitive Multi-Agent Debate for Software Issue Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.23348/) (2025)
- [xCodeEval: A Large Scale Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Code Understanding, Generation, Translation and Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03004/) (2023)
- [From Code to Correctness: Closing the Last Mile of Code Generation with Hierarchical Debugging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01215/) (2024)
- [SWE-Pruner: Self-Adaptive Context Pruning for Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16746/) (2026)
- [LongCodeZip: Compress Long Context for Code Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00446/) (2025)
- [SWE-QA: Can Language Models Answer Repository-level Code Questions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.14635/) (2025)
- [Pruning the Unsurprising: Efficient LLM Reasoning via First-Token Surprisal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05988/) (2025)
- [Between Lines of Code: Unraveling the Distinct Patterns of Machine and Human Programmers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06461/) (2024)
- [DOMAINEVAL: An Auto-Constructed Benchmark for Multi-Domain Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.13204/) (2024)
- [EvoC2Rust: A Skeleton-guided Framework for Project-Level C-to-Rust Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.04295/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [SWE-Pruner Pro: The Coder LLM Already Knows What to Prune](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.18213/) (2026)
- [Rethinking Code Performance Benchmarks for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.07619/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

LLMs have achieved strong results on both function-level code synthesis and repository-level code modification, yet a capability that falls between these two extremes -- compositional code creation, i.e., building a complete, internally structured class from a specification -- remains underserved. Current evaluations are either confined to isolated functions or rely on manually curated class-level tasks that are expensive to scale and increasingly susceptible to data contamination. We introduce ClassEval-Pro, a benchmark of 300 class-level tasks spanning 11 domains, constructed through an automated three-stage pipeline that combines complexity enhancement, cross-domain class composition, and integration of real-world GitHub code contributed after January 2025. Every task is validated by an LLM Judge Ensemble and must pass test suites with over 90% line coverage. We evaluate five frontier LLMs under five generation strategies. The best model achieves only 45.6% class-level Pass@1, with a 17.7-point gap between the strongest and weakest models, confirming the benchmark's discriminative power. Strategy choice strongly interacts with model capability: structured approaches such as bottom-up improve weaker models by up to 9.4 percentage points, while compositional generation collapses to as low as 1.3%. Error analysis over 500 manually annotated failures reveals that logic errors (56.2%) and dependency errors (38.0%) dominate, identifying cross-method coordination as the core bottleneck.