# Recipes for Calibration Checks in Safety-Critical Applications

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.26479 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26479/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2026.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Conformalized Quantile Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.03222/) (2019)
- [Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00263/) (2018)
- [Predictive inference with the jackknife+](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.02928/) (2019)
- [Evaluating model calibration in classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06977/) (2019)
- [A Review and Comparative Study on Probabilistic Object Detection in Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.10671/) (2020)
- [Distribution Calibration for Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.06023/) (2019)
- [Evaluating and Calibrating Uncertainty Prediction in Regression Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.11659/) (2019)
- [Calibration tests in multi-class classification: A unifying framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.11385/) (2019)
- [Classifier Calibration: A survey on how to assess and improve predicted class probabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10327/) (2021)
- [There are natural scores: Full comment on Shafer, "Testing by betting: A strategy for statistical and scientific communication"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05569/) (2021)
- [Regression Diagnostics meets Forecast Evaluation: Conditional Calibration, Reliability Diagrams, and Coefficient of Determination](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.03210/) (2021)
- [Graphical Test for Discrete Uniformity and its Applications in Goodness of Fit Evaluation and Multiple Sample Comparison](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.10522/) (2021)
- [Simulation-Based Calibration Checking for Bayesian Computation: The Choice of Test Quantities Shapes Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.02383/) (2022)
- [Honest calibration assessment for binary outcome predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.04065/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Calibration Assessment for Nested Uncertainty Sets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.04790/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Safety-critical prediction systems, such as autonomous vehicles, weather forecasters, and medical monitors, commonly rely on probabilistic forecasters. These forecasters make predictions about possible future outcomes, and their quality and robustness needs to be validated and certified. Often, only accuracy -- the mean of the predictions -- is evaluated against true outcomes. However, for safety-critical scenarios and decision making under uncertainty, the full distributional properties of the forecasts should be checked: do the observed prediction errors actually follow the forecasted probability distributions? To this end, we introduce a framework for calibration checks: statistical tests that validate distributional properties of forecasts when measured over many samples. In order to support ease-of-use in real-world operations, these checks produce a single accept/reject decision for data collected from a forecaster. This contrasts typical calibration calculations which produce one or multiple continuous calibration scores and require expertise to implement in a validation workflow. We further support operationalization by introducing modifications to calibration testing that (a) reject only overconfident predictions, allowing for pessimistic or cautious predictions in safety-critical settings, and (b) tolerate small, operationally acceptable deviations even for large numbers of validation samples. We organize the calibration checking process into a modular pipeline comprising four steps: (i) the data model, (ii) the chosen metric, (iii) the hypothesis formulation, and (iv) the testing procedure. Each step consists of independently swappable components, thereby supporting a large variety of possible use-cases and trade-offs. We demonstrate the applicability of the framework on two complementary example problems, weather forecasting and robot pose estimation.